I was trying to do a memory test to see how far back 3.5 could recall information from previous prompts, but it really doesn’t seem to like making pseudorandom seeds. 😆

  • DdCno1@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Consider keeping school the one place in a child’s life where they aren’t bombarded with AI-generated content.

    • yum13241@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes. Don’t be that one teacher who always has one multiple choice question that has no right answer.

    • NecroMemories@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      In a learning age band so bespoke, and education professionals so highly paid and resourced, I can’t imagine why this would be an attractive option.

      Maybe we let professionals decide what tool is best for their field

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe we let professionals decide what tool is best for their field

        Hey, really appreciated. Having random potentially uneducated, inexperienced people chime in on what they think I’m doing wrong in my classroom based on the tiniest snippet of information really shouldn’t matter, but it’s disheartening nontheless.

        While I take their point, I also wouldn’t walk into a garage and tell someone what they’re doing wrong with a vehicle, or tell a doctor I ran into on the streets that they’re misdiagnosing people based on a comment I overheard. Yet, because I work with children, I get this all the time. So, again, appreciated.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      As long as the content is manually overseen before being handed to students I can’t see why it would matter.

      A school question is a school question no matter who or what made it.