Dead wrong. The nazis will not be nice to you and respect your free speech because you respect theirs. Ever. They will lock you up regardless. This is not an even playing field.
If you say you are right to censor your worst enemys then the Nazis were logically also right to censor the opinions of the people THEY hated the most…
Supporting only certain peoples freedom of speech is the definition of censorship…
Everyone’s OPINION has to be tolerated. If you dont tolerate the people you deem “the intolerant” then those people will see you as intolerant (against them) aswell. According to you, they would then be right not not tolerate you (as “the intolerant” that doesnt tolerate them).
As long as they dont take away from anybody else’s freedom (and by just stating one’s opinion one doesnt do that) it has to be tolerated, otherwise it is censorship.
I have to assume that you are a Nazi yourself because you people always whine about censorship while having thousands upon thousands of radical right wing fascist talk shows while actively suppressing opposing voices in all your media outlets. You literally changed the law to have more Nazi propaganda while eliminating all other ideals. Now we have radical right wing violence. Your kind must be destroyed by any means necessary.
Nazis do not have rights and have not earned freedom. Their voices should absolutely be crushed by any means necessary, and no that does not make me a fascist any more than a cop shooting an active mass shooter makes him a fascist.
No it isn’t. One is a violent group who want to kill and enslave. The other respects life. They are not the same. They do not have the same rights. You are dead wrong, period. No amount of rationalization will make you not dead wrong.
Dead wrong. The nazis will not be nice to you and respect your free speech because you respect theirs. Ever. They will lock you up regardless. This is not an even playing field.
Being locked up is a pretty charitable assumption about what will happen given the Nazis’ history and current rhetoric.
If you say you are right to censor your worst enemys then the Nazis were logically also right to censor the opinions of the people THEY hated the most…
Supporting only certain peoples freedom of speech is the definition of censorship…
no. you cannot tolerate the intolerant.
Everyone’s OPINION has to be tolerated. If you dont tolerate the people you deem “the intolerant” then those people will see you as intolerant (against them) aswell. According to you, they would then be right not not tolerate you (as “the intolerant” that doesnt tolerate them).
As long as they dont take away from anybody else’s freedom (and by just stating one’s opinion one doesnt do that) it has to be tolerated, otherwise it is censorship.
what’s the value of me tolerating someone who’s stated aims are to do me, my family and friends harm?
What’s the value of tolerating any other opinion than yours?
I have to assume that you are a Nazi yourself because you people always whine about censorship while having thousands upon thousands of radical right wing fascist talk shows while actively suppressing opposing voices in all your media outlets. You literally changed the law to have more Nazi propaganda while eliminating all other ideals. Now we have radical right wing violence. Your kind must be destroyed by any means necessary.
Nazis do not have rights and have not earned freedom. Their voices should absolutely be crushed by any means necessary, and no that does not make me a fascist any more than a cop shooting an active mass shooter makes him a fascist.
No it isn’t. One is a violent group who want to kill and enslave. The other respects life. They are not the same. They do not have the same rights. You are dead wrong, period. No amount of rationalization will make you not dead wrong.