• m0darn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Don’t you think it’s good for the company if the death threat is received before they’ve spent millions of dollars on construction/procurement? While they can still afford to shift locations to a welcoming community? Don’t you think the consultation process may have alerted the company to the threat of vandalism and sabotage to their project?

    If I was building an industrial facility in a small town, I’d want to know the locals’ priorities re: noise vs visual aesthetics vs smells vs funding local community projects so that I could keep the electorate happy and not have to go head to head with a hostile local government making new rules to make my life miserable.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      If I was building an industrial facility in a small town

      You’ve never held a battery in your hands?

      They make no noise.
      They produce virtually no smells.
      They would be inside featureless buildings.

      I don’t know what grid storage you’ve been looking at, but battery storage is usually even more unobtrusive than distribution substations. We’re literally talking about some warehouse-looking building that is eminently forgettable.

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        My comment was within the context of the person I was replying to suggesting companies should abandon public consultations all together.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why would you go through all that when you can just bribe the local officials instead