WashedOver@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 months agoThey forgot the LGBTQ...lemmy.caimagemessage-square154fedilinkarrow-up11.57Karrow-down1118
arrow-up11.45Karrow-down1imageThey forgot the LGBTQ...lemmy.caWashedOver@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square154fedilink
minus-squaredangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·11 months agoPeople always say this and then fail to provide a single example of when proper socialism existed and then destroyed the country.
minus-squarediprount_tomato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-211 months ago“This theory when applied didn’t end like in the book, therefore it’s not really that theory”
minus-squareLemmysMum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·11 months agoCommunism without actually sharing isn’t communism. Democracy without fair elections isn’t democracy. Socialism without the socialisation of the benefit of production is not socialism. Your ignorance of these things doesn’t change what they are.
minus-squarediprount_tomato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-211 months agoAgain, the “the theory when applied doesn’t look like in the book so it’s not real communism”
minus-squareLemmysMum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-211 months agoNo. The theory when applied doesn’t follow the book. The difference is something called contextual nuance, and you have no grasp of it. Your position is like North Korea claiming democracy doesn’t work because they say they are one and it’s not working.
minus-squarediprount_tomato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoThe theory when applied ends up not following the book… I wonder why?
minus-squareLemmysMum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-211 months ago The theory when applied ends up not following the book… I wonder why? Because you can’t read, as proven. The difference is something called contextual nuance, and you have no grasp of it. Your position is like North Korea claiming democracy doesn’t work because they say they are one and it’s not working. You can continue acting stupid, but in your case I’m not sure it’s an act.
minus-squarediprount_tomato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-211 months agoNorth Korea’s definitely working. If it didn’t work it would have collapsed. It’s still hell, but a working one
minus-squareLemmysMum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-211 months agoIs the Democratic Republic Of North Korea a Democracy? Because you’re trying to say yes. Like I said, it’s called contextual nuance and you have no grasp of it. You can continue acting stupid, but in your case I’m not sure it’s an act.
People always say this and then fail to provide a single example of when proper socialism existed and then destroyed the country.
“This theory when applied didn’t end like in the book, therefore it’s not really that theory”
Communism without actually sharing isn’t communism. Democracy without fair elections isn’t democracy. Socialism without the socialisation of the benefit of production is not socialism. Your ignorance of these things doesn’t change what they are.
Again, the “the theory when applied doesn’t look like in the book so it’s not real communism”
No. The theory when applied doesn’t follow the book. The difference is something called contextual nuance, and you have no grasp of it.
Your position is like North Korea claiming democracy doesn’t work because they say they are one and it’s not working.
The theory when applied ends up not following the book… I wonder why?
Because you can’t read, as proven.
The difference is something called contextual nuance, and you have no grasp of it.
Your position is like North Korea claiming democracy doesn’t work because they say they are one and it’s not working.
You can continue acting stupid, but in your case I’m not sure it’s an act.
North Korea’s definitely working. If it didn’t work it would have collapsed. It’s still hell, but a working one
Is the Democratic Republic Of North Korea a Democracy? Because you’re trying to say yes.
Like I said, it’s called contextual nuance and you have no grasp of it.
You can continue acting stupid, but in your case I’m not sure it’s an act.