I’m not sure, what you’re trying to tell me. If someone’s broadly built and muscular, but happens to have a vagina in their pants, they still need a higher dosage than someone who isn’t broadly built and muscular. Well, that’s assuming the medication doesn’t cause trouble with e.g. an uterus (and assuming they’ve got an uterus to go with their vagina).
That’s what I mean with “nature is messy”. Whatever assumption you make about whatever categorization, you’ll find lots of examples that don’t fit. It’s easy to think in categories, but you have to always be aware and accepting that it’s going to be mildly wrong.
And especially a doctor should know what they’re doing, treating people according to their actual needs, not according to some category that may or may not fit.
Most things are done in averages when you’re talking about a large population so the average doses between sexes are different that was the first part the second part is the averages of physical differences between sexes, so my bad I it seem like I was putting the two together. And my overall point is that it’s not I was born a male and feel/mentally that I’m female or vice versa, it’s morphed into I am what I claim to be regardless of these averages and differences between the two sexes, don’t question me, which can lead to adverse effects when it comes to your dosage in medication’s, and the differences in weight classes and bone and muscle density.
We do not dose based on gender. We dose based on height, weight, and individual response/tolerance of a medication. Nobody cares what’s in your pants when we’re giving you drugs. Definitely no one is taking your bone density into account. I literally just sent out the tiniest little old lady from our critical care unit yesterday on the highest dose of metoprolol I’ve ever seen in my life.
Stop lying. Trans rights are human rights. Gender affirming care is medical care. The medical community is clear on that point.
So, you’re saying they don’t have different trial runs for medication for the two sexes based on its type and what it’s for? Also, that medication doesn’t and cannot have different effects on the two sexes based on the type of medication? Bring up points about something doesn’t make you against or for a group of people. Also, other countries that bet American to gender affirming care stopped it and made laws against it because of the possible side effects, such as the Finland, Sweden, France, Norway, and the U.K.
No, they do not have different drug trials based on sex or gender. No, medication absolutely does not have different effects based on sex or gender. Hearts, lungs , kidneys, all work the same no matter what kind of reproductive organs you happen to possess.
We do not distinguish based on sex or gender when administering medications. We only account for body size and individual response/tolerance to a medication.
The issue is when it comes to medicine doses between males and females and biological advantages, and disadvantages between those two sexes.
I’m not sure, what you’re trying to tell me. If someone’s broadly built and muscular, but happens to have a vagina in their pants, they still need a higher dosage than someone who isn’t broadly built and muscular. Well, that’s assuming the medication doesn’t cause trouble with e.g. an uterus (and assuming they’ve got an uterus to go with their vagina).
That’s what I mean with “nature is messy”. Whatever assumption you make about whatever categorization, you’ll find lots of examples that don’t fit. It’s easy to think in categories, but you have to always be aware and accepting that it’s going to be mildly wrong.
And especially a doctor should know what they’re doing, treating people according to their actual needs, not according to some category that may or may not fit.
Most things are done in averages when you’re talking about a large population so the average doses between sexes are different that was the first part the second part is the averages of physical differences between sexes, so my bad I it seem like I was putting the two together. And my overall point is that it’s not I was born a male and feel/mentally that I’m female or vice versa, it’s morphed into I am what I claim to be regardless of these averages and differences between the two sexes, don’t question me, which can lead to adverse effects when it comes to your dosage in medication’s, and the differences in weight classes and bone and muscle density.
I’m a critical care nurse.
We do not dose based on gender. We dose based on height, weight, and individual response/tolerance of a medication. Nobody cares what’s in your pants when we’re giving you drugs. Definitely no one is taking your bone density into account. I literally just sent out the tiniest little old lady from our critical care unit yesterday on the highest dose of metoprolol I’ve ever seen in my life.
Stop lying. Trans rights are human rights. Gender affirming care is medical care. The medical community is clear on that point.
So, you’re saying they don’t have different trial runs for medication for the two sexes based on its type and what it’s for? Also, that medication doesn’t and cannot have different effects on the two sexes based on the type of medication? Bring up points about something doesn’t make you against or for a group of people. Also, other countries that bet American to gender affirming care stopped it and made laws against it because of the possible side effects, such as the Finland, Sweden, France, Norway, and the U.K.
No, they do not have different drug trials based on sex or gender. No, medication absolutely does not have different effects based on sex or gender. Hearts, lungs , kidneys, all work the same no matter what kind of reproductive organs you happen to possess.
We do not distinguish based on sex or gender when administering medications. We only account for body size and individual response/tolerance to a medication.
Okay, I’ll go with the professional.