• Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    NEW CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

    No person shall hold an elected or appointed position past the age of 10 years younger than average life expectancy, to be updated each census year. A special election is held to replace the person when this age is reached in the case of elected office. A new appointment required in 30 days for appointed positions.

    • hascat@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like this, but I’d drop the special election in favor of disqualifying candidates who would age out during their term.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the few issues where you can legit say “both parties are as bad as each other”.

      Half these people should be retired.

      • teamevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it isn’t right vs left, it’s various flavors of have vs the have nots. Just half the have nots (probably more) are stupid as shit, according to the other half. Then we just bicker while they fucking fleece our dumbasses.

        • MelonTheMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Keep saying it. Everyone agrees and yet congress doesn’t enact it 🤔 I’m just glad the oligarchs understand the will of the people better than us rabble!

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good idea. Much better than hard age limits as it may actually convince the boomers in charge to improve overall quality of life.

    • Zyansheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Disaster happens, child mortality goes up a lot somehow, average life expectancy plummets below 25, no one is eligible for any Senate or House office 👀

      • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        average life expectancy plummets below 25

        I think our rules about senate qualification would be the least of our worries at that point!

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe they would’ve done more to prevent the sudden drop in life expectancy. Then again they would also pass any law that could extend life expectancy. Like making it illegal to pull the plug, outlawing dnr, etc.

    • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Already you can be removed if you are unable to carry out your duties. It is the will to do it that is lacking. I don’t think tying terms to an average life expectancy is reasonable. You could have a pretty wide range across states for instance and people would constantly sue over how it should be calculated.

      I think a better angle would be to just set term limits. Set them longer for congressmen if people want.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think most of the issues in the world right now are caused by career politicians who’s only interested is getting re-elected.

      • DarthDaddy87@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree. Maybe if their grasp on power was tied to the average life expectancy in their continuency they might actually make an effort to improve it. Sure they’ll sue but, I think it’s worth trying.