• xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Wingman seems doubly appropriate here. There’s obviously the parachute itself, but in this case, I think we’ll see that second kid is going to turn out like Goose from Top Gun.

  • VioletRing@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    10 months ago

    My older sister and I once made a very questionable swing. My youngest sister was more than happy to be the first one to try it. She had to climb up on the picnic table, under the apple tree, to sit in a chair. We then hoisted the chair up by rope. The chair promptly flipped, we dropped the rope and little sister broke her elbow. Managed to hide the broken elbow from Mom and Dad till the next morning.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        My daughter fractured her elbow in a bike accident and we didn’t know until the next day. We thought it was just sprained. She wasn’t acting like it was so bad that it was broken and she went to sleep okay.

  • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    10 months ago

    Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial | The BMJ

    Objective To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major traumatic injury when jumping from an aircraft.

    Design Randomized controlled trial.

    Setting Private or commercial aircraft between September 2017 and August 2018.

    Participants 92 aircraft passengers aged 18 and over were screened for participation. 23 agreed to be enrolled and were randomized.

    Intervention Jumping from an aircraft (airplane or helicopter) with a parachute versus an empty backpack (unblinded).

    • Yawnder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      “participants included in the study were on aircraft at significantly lower altitude (mean of 0.6 m for participants v mean of 9146 m for non-participants; P<0.001) and lower velocity (mean of 0 km/h v mean of 800 km/h”

    • Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is hilarious. I don’t know anything about the field or the journal but they have a good sense of humor.