J.D. Vance, the junior U.S. senator from Ohio, zeroed in on this in a social media post on Wednesday: “We’ve spent so much time winning a legal argument on abortion that we’ve fallen behind on the moral argument,” he wrote.
Vance is right.
J.D. Vance, the junior U.S. senator from Ohio, zeroed in on this in a social media post on Wednesday: “We’ve spent so much time winning a legal argument on abortion that we’ve fallen behind on the moral argument,” he wrote.
Vance is right.
“Is X safe?” isn’t a question of value. It is a scientifically verifiable question. You need to actually read.
“harm” is a question of value. The fact you pretend otherwise means your either too stupid or too dishonest to be worth talking to further.
No it isn’t, it’s objectively measurable. If you lose 3L of blood, the harms associated can be objectively measured. If you lose a limb, the harms are objectively measurable. If you smoke a pack a day, the decrease in your lifespan is objectively measurable.
What the fuck are you talking about.
Jesus you’re a stupid sack of shit. “harm” is fundamentally a subjective concept. The universe doesn’t give a single fuck if you lose 3L of blood or 3 drops. There is no intrinsic value associated with it. That value is only created subjectively, by people. I would think for how much shit you talk you’d at least have a fucking minimal understanding of the topic. Clearly I thought to highly of a rat like you.
You need to take a look in the mirror if you can’t go two seconds without resorting to ad hominems.
If there is a stupid sack of shit rat among the two of us, it clearly isn’t me.
In the same way septic tanks “subjectively” smell bad. Get a grip and learn to care about something other than semantics.
So you’re just being a dishonest sack of shit and pretending your subjective perspective is fact because you have no argument. Get bent, you worthless rat