• NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    They were warned to go to the South and most.of them did.

    Then they were bombed along the way, couldn’t take shelter in the south and had to go back.

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They were afraid of bombing on the route to safety so they returned to continued bombing.

      Makes sense.

      It’s not a wall of bombs on the border and you’re at risk either way.

      • Stanard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Preface: I do not know enough of this subject or conflict to speak authoritatively.

        If they were told to leave their homes and take a certain path to avoid being bombed, trusted that advice but were bombed on the “safe” path anyway by the very people who told them they would be safe if they took said path, why should they continue to trust whoever told them that?

        Furthermore, if there were bombs dropping on and/or around you no matter what you did or who you listened to, simply for existing in the wrong place and at no fault of your own, wouldn’t you rather at least be in the “comfort” of your own home?

    • Dontcare@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you know this? Is it from the say people who said their was a hospital bombing ? They lie about everything. I’m not saying I know for sure but I am skeptical. It is possible some people were bombed but there are many many people who evacuated to the South

        • Dontcare@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is a report relying pal reporting, after the hospital thing I will definitely not take it at face value, and none the less they started a war.

          • 4lan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is not disputed. Why is the default assumption that Palestinians are lying and Israelis are not?

            Everyone needs to take a step back and look at their own biases on this issue

            • Dontcare@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because pals always lie, because all these Arab countries are propaganda regimes. They had hamas spokespeople on CNN and BBC saying things like civilians are were not targeted on 10/7. They tell the most ridiculous lies. Do you you also think North Korea are not liars, do you Believe the North Korean dictator for 18 holes in one at golf?

      • Stanard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Great job on stereotyping an entire population of peoples as liars. 👍

        And downplaying the loss of innocent lives to boot.

        It is “possible” that some were bombed? I guess as long as only some innocent people were bombed everything is ok. After all “many many” were safely uprooted from their homes and evacuated south. Hooray

        I doubt this will sink in but I have to try. There have definitely been innocent lives lost from both sides of this conflict and every one of them is a tragedy. I’m not advocating for either side here because everyone involved in the loss of innocent lives sucks. I don’t have a magical solution either so don’t bother asking. Innocent people have already, and will continue to die in this conflict. Don’t try to make it seem like innocent casualties aren’t a big deal.