return2ozma@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 year ago'Wildly more expensive': Workers with in-office jobs spend about $31/day that they wouldn't working from home — here's what employers need to dofinance.yahoo.comexternal-linkmessage-square127fedilinkarrow-up1680arrow-down16
arrow-up1674arrow-down1external-link'Wildly more expensive': Workers with in-office jobs spend about $31/day that they wouldn't working from home — here's what employers need to dofinance.yahoo.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square127fedilink
minus-squarebhmnscmm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThat’s fair to say for lunch. Not for breakfast though, unless one makes the argument there should also be a breakfast break. Regardless, with the existing status quo it’s not a good financial decision to eat out for breakfast and lunch everyday.
minus-squareecho64@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·1 year agoThe status quo shouldn’t mean that you are forced to spend time outside of work time preparing for work time. Unless they want to pay for that time, or your lunch.
That’s fair to say for lunch. Not for breakfast though, unless one makes the argument there should also be a breakfast break.
Regardless, with the existing status quo it’s not a good financial decision to eat out for breakfast and lunch everyday.
The status quo shouldn’t mean that you are forced to spend time outside of work time preparing for work time. Unless they want to pay for that time, or your lunch.