• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I hate Republicans with a fiery passion, but this kind of idea makes me think that if members of Congress aren’t free to choose not to certify an election without negative consequences, there really shouldn’t be a certification process at all. It has about as much meaning as Putin getting reelected with 120% of the vote.

    • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There shouldn’t be imo, it’s entirely procedural by that point

      It’s much more likely that 200 congress people attempt to pull a soft coup and overthrow the government (as many of them did in backing Donald Trump) than it is for the thousands of state level election workers and courts to do the same