cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/7659731

HELSINKI/VILNIUS, Oct 20 (Reuters) - An investigation into the damage to the Balticonnector gas pipeline is currently focused on the role of the Chinese NewNew Polar Bear container vessel, Finland’s National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) said on Friday.

Early on Oct. 8, a gas pipeline and a telecoms cable connecting Finland and Estonia were broken, in what Finnish investigators said may have been sabotage, though they have yet to conclude whether it was an accident or a deliberate act.

On Tuesday, Sweden said a third link, connecting Stockholm to Tallinn, had been damaged at roughly the same time as the other two.

“The police have established in the criminal investigation that the movements of the vessel NewNew Polar Bear flying the flag of Hong Kong coincide with the time and place of the gas pipeline damage,” NBI said in a statement.

“For this reason, the investigation is now focused on the role of the said vessel,” the Finnish investigators added.

Following Finland’s NBI statement, Estonian investigators, who are also looking into the telecoms cable incidents, said they were still looking at two ships, the NewNew Polar Bear and Russia’s Sevmorput.

“We have identified that during the incidents, the vessels NewNew Polar Bear and Sevmorput were in the area. We are still investigating whether or not these vessels had anything to do with the damage,” they said in a statement to Reuters.

Only these two ships were present at all three incident sites around the approximate time when the damage occurred, according to vessel tracking data reviewed by Reuters.

  • interolivary@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It being registered in Hong Kong doesn’t necessarily tell us much about who’s operating the ship though.

    Other suspicious ships being looked into are a couple of ships registered in Liberia: the Viktor Bakaev which is owned by SCF Novoship in Russia, and the Pskov which is owned by Sovcomflot and likewise in Russia

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then why is the article calling it a Chinese ship? Seems awfully xenophobic if that is the case.

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Good question. Based on a quick search that led me to Lloyd’s Register, it looks like its registered owner is a Chinese company called Hainan Xin Xin Yang Shipping, so that’s probably why?