☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoChina raises five demands during Yellen’s visitasiatimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square173fedilinkarrow-up126arrow-down115cross-posted to: worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up111arrow-down1external-linkChina raises five demands during Yellen’s visitasiatimes.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square173fedilinkcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoI’m sure everyone is very proud of you for repeating things that I stated previously in this thread and pretending they are your argument. Wait right here, I’ll find someone who can slow clap for you(I feel like you’ll be able to understand the clap better that way).
minus-squarezephyreks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoSo… you don’t have an argument? Great!
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoAn argument against you repeating what I said and agreeing with me? No, I stand by what I said and you parroted.
minus-squarezephyreks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoso… you really do have no argument, huh? You claim that taking state subsidies makes a company state-sponsored. I claim that that’s stupid, because it means that Intel and Microsoft would be considered state-sponsored enterprises.
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoI don’t have an argument against my own argument, no. Regardless of what you claim I claim, you’ve already taken my side on all of this. Thank you for your support!.
minus-squarezephyreks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoSo, you really don’t have an argument, huh?
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI do not have an argument against my own argument that you apparently agree with, no.
minus-squarezephyreks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSo… You don’t have an argument against my argument that isn’t your argument, because you don’t understand the argument?
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIncorrect, although you are consistent with your method of pretending someone is saying something they aren’t. Thank you for your continued support
I’m sure everyone is very proud of you for repeating things that I stated previously in this thread and pretending they are your argument.
Wait right here, I’ll find someone who can slow clap for you(I feel like you’ll be able to understand the clap better that way).
So… you don’t have an argument? Great!
An argument against you repeating what I said and agreeing with me?
No, I stand by what I said and you parroted.
so… you really do have no argument, huh? You claim that taking state subsidies makes a company state-sponsored.
I claim that that’s stupid, because it means that Intel and Microsoft would be considered state-sponsored enterprises.
I don’t have an argument against my own argument, no.
Regardless of what you claim I claim, you’ve already taken my side on all of this.
Thank you for your support!.
So, you really don’t have an argument, huh?
I do not have an argument against my own argument that you apparently agree with, no.
So… You don’t have an argument against my argument that isn’t your argument, because you don’t understand the argument?
Incorrect, although you are consistent with your method of pretending someone is saying something they aren’t.
Thank you for your continued support