Australian national broadcaster ABC has projected three states voted No, effectively defeating the referendum.

  • JustSomePerson@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Grow the fuck up. You are the one arguing for race-based legislation. That makes you the racist. Every human has the right to be equal in the eyes of the law. There simply cannot be an excuse for having tests based on genetics that lead to different rights in a society. That’s just purely despicable in every way.

    • MJBrune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There is Equality, Equity, and Justice. I highly recommend reading about why you should go for Justice rather than Equality. Also, this law would have nothing based on race or genetics. It was based on what the tribes, which are organization bodies like the Australian government, would put in the committee. It’s fairly racist to assume that indigenous committee representatives have to be of indigenous genetics in this day and age.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Racism, by definition, is treating one race negatively. Enshrinign the voice in the constitution is not racist, while you’re being pedantic.

      • Welt@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        If one “race” (which isn’t a scientific term and its use in the US is dated and itself racist) is treated differently from another, regardless of which group is perceived to be treated favourably or unfavourably, such a situation can legitimately be described as racist.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not according to the definition, to wit: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.

          Racism is by definition negative treatment, not different treatment. Putting darker make up on a black actor is not racist. Giving women breast cancer screening is not sexist.

          • JustSomePerson@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            It is fucking disgusting to see your defense of racism.

            ALL HUMANS HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE TREATED EQUALLY IN THE EYES OF THE LAW!

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Currently, the Australian constitution allows for different races or people to be treated differently. In practice, this has meant laws targeting ATSI people. The voice was a proposal, from consultation over many years within their community to have a say in any proposed law. It gives minimal power, just a voice to be heard. It’s part of the Uluṟu process, which is guided by the Uluṟu statement.

              Racism is treating one group negatively, based on race, as per the definition above. This was an attempt to start a process to right historical racist wrongs and lead a path to true equality together. Quite the opposite of racism.

              Screeching about misplaced racism doesn’t make you factually correct or morally correct.