Researchers’ analysis of DNA suggests housing circumstances ‘get under the skin’ and are associated with significant health consequences

Living in a privately rented home is linked to more rapid biological ageing, according to researchers who tested DNA and found the tenure is associated with twice the ageing effect of obesity and half that of smoking.

The peer-reviewed study of 1,420 UK householders found housing circumstances can “get under the skin” with significant consequences for health, said academics at the University of Essex and the University of Adelaide . Their findings were published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

  • Dojan@lemmy.worldEnglish
    57·
    1 year ago

    What, the uncertainty and stress from renting from an individual that can do almost anything with your housing situation on a whim can cause you to wear faster? I’m so surprised! What a revelation! Wow!

    • highduc@lemmy.mlEnglish
      111·
      1 year ago

      I agree with you but I think a lot of renters don’t see their situation quite like that and certainly the vast majority of landlords don’t see it like that.
      If this enters the collective consciousness just a bit I think that’ll be good.

      • Dojan@lemmy.worldEnglish
        5·
        1 year ago

        It’s easy for things to go sour though. I’ve a friend whose landlord comes on spontaneous visits each week. He doesn’t schedule them, he just unlocks the door and invites himself in. None of the tenants like it but they’re worried about bringing up the issue because they’ve nowhere else to live and thus don’t want to sour the relationship with their landlord.

        I live in Sweden. That type of private landlordism exists here too, but I’ve made a point to avoid renting from them for precisely that reason. I’d prefer to rent from the government but the wait lists are too long, so private companies is the only option that remains. It’s expensive, but I can lean on the tenants union if the company doesn’t provide what they are contractually obliged to provide. As such I don’t have to worry about the whims of a singular individual, and there’s no “relationship” as such to sour.

        There are obviously downsides, but I prefer a more formal/clinical approach you just can’t get when renting from individuals.

        • BedSharkPal@lemmy.caEnglish
          3·
          1 year ago

          You guys have government housing and tenant unions? That sounds amazing from my Canadian perspective!

          • Dojan@lemmy.worldEnglish
            4·
            1 year ago

            Union. It’s just the one as far as I know, Hyresgästföreningen, though it exists nationwide.

            Government housing in this case are smaller companies owned by individual municipalities, rather than the state. My previous town Nyköping had a landlord run by the municipality called Nyköpingshem. These companies don’t necessarily exist to make a profit, though if they do profit the profits get reinvested generally into the housing, or into the municipality itself. They also sometimes get cash injections from the municipality for specific purposes, e.g. new developments. I think the queue time for a three roomer from Nyköpingshem was like 5-8 years. The government (state) isn’t doing a whole lot to fix the housing crisis, I feel.

            So the tenants union serve to negotiate rents with the landlord unions (Fastighetsägarna), with a third party acting as a mediator. Generally rent increases have been done once per year, this year landlords got greedy and tried a second raise (they aimed for 15% first time, and 12% second time). It’s not really something that’s been done before so the union is afraid it’ll set a new precedent.

            See, landlords are actually free to set whatever rent they please, and increase it however they please, but the tenant union can push against this, and if its found that rents have been egregiously high, or the landlords haven’t delivered as they should, they’ll need to pay the tenants back.

            And so we usually stick to the once-per-year process. Negotiations for next year should start soon, and will generally be finished sometime in the first quarter. This year because of the recession and such, some negotiations really dragged on. My old landlord didn’t finalise their BS until June or so. Then they asked for the rent retroactively. Twerps.

            Some landlords have raised a second time already this year. I’m not sure if there’s an official ruling yet, but I read something about at least some of them being forced to pay back their tenants.

            Hyresgästföreningen has their own publication, focused specifically on everything around renting.

            Oh yeah, there’s no requirement to be a member in Hyresgästföreningen. They negotiate the nationwide rents regardless, so you benefit even if you’re not a member. Though you can generally negotiate individually with your landlord if you so please.