• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok then, so I misinterpreted it. How about confirming without the snark?

    It’s possible that people can supply context to modify without outright rejecting a position

    Wow thank you so much for the condescension. I was not aware that people can add context. I wouldn’t have known without this arrogant sentence

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t even realize that I’m not the same user, clearly you aren’t reading calmly and attentively.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had like 8 replies in my inbox, please forgive me for not realizing it was a completely different person jumping to the defense of someone

    • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it possible you’re injecting some of your own negativity? You initially misinterpreted something as challenging and then feel the need to continue to demand a certain implication in a different comment.

      I simply explained why I made the comment I made and you’re taking the opportunity to be upset by both while even already acknowledging a mistake, completely oblivious to your own bias.

      Maybe take a breather and get off the internet for a while? You don’t seem to be handling it very well.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I now firmly believe that you meant no condescension in your snarky reply, thank you.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Done, and here’s a gold star for you. “I was agreeing with you, just adding some context” would have been a bad way to say it when there was an opportunity to talk down to me. It won’t happen again!

              • glimse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah because you’re being a douche lol

                At least you’re owning up to it now

                • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So it’s okay for you to respond with anger, but the way I respond makes me a douche?

                  So it’s okay for you to get upset at fake internet points and I’m the douche because you’re upset?

                  You’re a cunt, lol

                  • glimse@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There was no anger from me in my first reply to you. You were unjustifiably condescending in your second reply and acted like you didn’t. Now you’re admitting you were condescending but it’s ok because I can’t control your speech?

                    That’s called moving the goalposts. My crime here is expecting anything else in the comments of a degenerate “watch people die” community

            • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So I’m obligated to socialize at your standards?

              Good luck in life, you’re going to struggle very much

              • glimse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The point isn’t that I think you should speak a certain, it’s that you’re pretending you weren’t being condescending with your reply and my interpretation was just wrong.

                But it sounds like now you agree that you were so we’re good.

                Everyone loves talking to arrogant dicks so I’m sure if you carry this demeanor off the internet, life will be easy for you