Saw this online elsewhere and figured I’d share here for discussion

  • RampageDon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    People blindly buy any new apple product. Why spend the money to change something when an overwhelming majority will buy the product anyway.

      • RampageDon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Holy crap, if I am being honest I had no idea this was a blind community/instance. It just showed up on my all feed. Probably not the best choice of words. Feel like a jerk. Sorry to anyone who comes across my comment!

              • RampageDon@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yea, a dumb mistake on my part won’t make me shy away. It was super cool to find this place, even if it was through my ignorance. Don’t know any blind people irl so the thought never really crossed my mind that there would be a dedicated community like this.

                • cordlord@rblind.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  The freedom to create third-party clients (apps) for social media platforms has a really vital effect on accessibility, because it facilitates friendly competition (and productive copying) among a wide range of client apps, as well as allowing disabled app developers to freely create apps that meet their own accessibility needs.

                  Reddit’s rug-pull with free API usage was thus especially controversial among blind users, virtually all of whom were using one of various third-party apps. While Reddit eventually made some gestures towards accessibility improvements in the first-party client, this place was nonetheless created as a hedge against their caprices.

                  Feel free to sub! Like the rest of Lemmy, this community has a lot of growing to do if it’s to replace its counterparts among the proprietary monoliths.

    • Pratai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The same can be said for Microsoft, Google, Samsung….

      Diehard loyalty isn’t something exclusive to Apple. Don’t try and make it seems so.

      • RampageDon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I didn’t mean specifically apple, but that’s what this article is about. The point still stands why fix it when people still buy it. Chill out, sounds like I hit a nerve.

      • cordlord@rblind.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Apple has probably the best marketing in the world. Part of that marketing success means that Apple is better at bedazzling people and making a product appealing beyond just its practical use. There’s anything wrong with Apple users, but Apple is definitely better at commodity fetishism than any other company I can think of.

      • vivadanang@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Diehard loyalty isn’t something exclusive to Apple. Don’t try and make it seems so.

        no it’s just the one with the highest markup for brand loyalty (aka: stupid tax)

        • Pratai@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Good thing opinions aren’t to be mistaken for reality.