• Wooly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    And most people would be happy with them switching to more green production methods.

    Like Shell, yes we need power so stopping oil production all at once is a bad idea. But they’ve known about climate change for 40+ years. And instead of adapting to green energy, they campaigned and scare mongered against it.

    It’s much easier to regulate 100 companies than 8 billion people.

    • Ysysel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes we need to regulate industries. But you can regulate the meat industry all you want, as long as we consume that much meat it will be a problem.

      The “Ok but companies…” people throw around every time we talk about personal responsability is only used to ignore that responsability. And I think meat consumption is the best example because everyone can stop eating meat. It’s cheaper and does not require any particular effort.

      • Wooly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tbh, like most changes in history. Government’s need to regulate it. The smoking bans, the little recycling laws we have now, emission targets/laws.

        Certain industries can change to reduce emissions, others, like meat, will eventually get outright banned and it’s the only real way we’ll ever reduce meat consumption.