Scientists in Belgrade came up with the idea of “planting” large tanks of water and algae in places where trees can’t grow. The tanks are 10-50x more efficient than a normal tree for the space it takes up and is in general highly sustainable, even creating excellent fertilizer in the process. You can skip about halfway through the video for the actual information about them.

  • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, it’s cool, but I can’t sit underneath it if I’m trying to get out of the sun. Maybe in the afternoon, but certainly not midday. Idk, trees are obviously suited to land but these are cool public art pieces, plus they’re sustainable and sinks CO2 (but who knows how clean construction is).

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure it could be but into horizontal panels, for instance the roof of a bus stop. Also probably in tubes for larger partial-shade configurations (like a pergola).

      That and obviously it should be in addition to trees rather than a replacement.

      • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        yes all the negativity in the thread is making the false supposition that you have to choose between an algae tank and trees. the choice is an algae tank or no algae tank.

    • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s looking at it as a zero-sum thing. You’re not choosing between an algae tank and a utopian solarpunk city with no cars, tree lined streets, and bikes and grassy trams every where. You’re choosing between an algae tank and all its benefits, or no algae tank. I would choose the algae tank over nothing any day. Would I take it in place of a perfect solarpunk city where we all live in trees and get around with rope bridges? hell no.