cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400327

In case anyone is wondering, it’s rqd2.

The definition of paraphilia is “a condition characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities.”, which can inclde pedophilia.

It has recieved 4 censures from fediseer due to the content contained on that instance

Not a good look for Lemmy to be promoting any instance like that.

You can see for yourself here

Update: A pull request was sent to remove the sus instance. It should no longer show up soon

    • pedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      65
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks. I hate politically correct language like this

      • stratoscaster@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        100
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not real, it was a joke made by 4chan that stuck. Nobody is actually using that term unless they’re a pedophile

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are actual retards out in the wild that use the term to describe pedophiles unironically. No one likes them. Bully them.

        • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The term is real, it’s even used in scientific literature. The term possibly even predates 4chan, or maybe it’s just a success on 4chan’s part, successfully laundering a term into scientific discourse? It’s hard to find too much solid evidence on the origin of the term. 4chan did seriously signal boost it with the whole “MAP Pride” thing though.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Anti-unnecessary terms. Changing “child porn” (or CP) to “CSAM” is a ridiculous, confusing, and unnecessary thing. And it takes effort away from meaningful action.

              • shagie@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                https://www.rainn.org/news/what-child-sexual-abuse-material-csam

                While the term child pornography is still widely used by the public, it’s more accurate to call it what it is: evidence of child sexual abuse. That’s why RAINN and others have stopped using the term child pornography and switched to referring to it as CSAM — child sexual abuse materials.

                While some of the pornography online depicts adults who have consented to be filmed, that’s never the case when the images depict children. Just as kids can’t legally consent to sex, they can’t consent to having images of their abuse recorded and distributed. Every explicit photo or video of a kid is actually evidence that the child has been a victim of sexual abuse.

              • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Making of a big deal about it is what takes away effort from meaningful action. Nobody is taking time out of their day over this issue but you. This is silly.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its not real language.

        Its some bullshit cooked up by internet trolls, and accepted and used by right wing propagandists, as the latest thing to use to try and paint gay people as pedophiles.

        When, historically, we know the actual pedophiles are the ones falsely claiming gays are the danger to children.

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s inclusive of both pedophiles and hebephiles - that is, prepubescent vs. pubescent children.

        So, it’s got that going for it. Treating them both the same.

        Unfortunately, it’s also used to obfuscate the fact that a MAP is a pedophile/hebephile. Which is bad.

        There are people who have messed up brains, who are attracted to kids, and hate themselves for it. They seek help (usually through lots of chemical treatments), and use the term MAP to separate themselves from the pedos. Unfortunately, pedos use the term MAP to hide the fact they’re pedos, so… 🤷

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Tell us you’re not actually paying attention without telling us you’re not actually paying attention

              There are people who have messed up brains, who are attracted to kids, and hate themselves for it. They seek help (usually through lots of chemical treatments), and use the term MAP to separate themselves from the pedos.

              This is a lie meant to make pedophiles come off as sympathetic. They’re ALL terrible and there is no distinction between one pedo and another. If there’s anything that horrific instance should have shown anyone, it’s that. Any pedo who claims they hate themselves for it and are getting therapy are lying to you.

              Maybe actually read what’s being said before blowing a gasket.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, I’m sure someone who won’t put up with you trying to frame pedophiles in a positive light would be a monster in your eyes. Can’t have anyone actually hold the pond scum you’re protecting accountable in any meaningful way. How else would you fulfill your pathological need to feel needed?

                  You keep living up to your namesake and you’re going to find yourself in a gutter with a crack pipe and an empty bottle of Jim Beam, dude. Seriously.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, it is not politically correct language, actually it’s language that’s commonly frowned upon in all circles. But basically as long as the LGBT rights movements have existed with any level of mainstream visibility in America, there have been organizations like NAMBLA and the like that have been trying to piggyback off of them…

        And it pretty much ends the same way, with the pedophiles being shown the door.

        Incidentally this is what the early South Park episode about the National Association of Marlon Brando Look Alikes getting mad at NAMBLA (the irl NAtional Man Boy Love Association) for stealing their acronym is poking fun at.