In the spirit of being encouraged to speak my mind here’s a slight effort post:

Defederation does not do what you think it does.

The instance creator and admins are those with the ultimate power within their instance. The active users delegate them that power by interacting with their instance.

Defining “defederation” within the context of Lemmy as I understand it:

“the act of denying the ability for accounts within specific instances to interact with each other”

Anyone at this current time can create an account on most instances. One site on sh.itjust.works is defederated right now, but anyone here may also have an account there, who knows? The value comes from our activity and interaction within each instance.

Defederation is a narrow and a slippery slope because it doesn’t actually solve any problems. There are many instances which are doing things I think should be banned. I don’t interact with them. I don’t provide them with any value.

We uphold an inclusive enjoyable community here by being active. Individuals with malicious intent are ostracized naturally by an active community. Defederating entire instances does not stop bad actors, but an active strongwilled community does.

It’s not our responsibility to moderate other instances.

  • TendieMaster69@sh.itjust.worksOP
    128·
    1 year ago

    Oh no, what I’m suggesting is that we can’t stop them from here. On sh.itjust.works the best we can do is self-moderate. It’s not our responsibility to moderate other instances, and defederating is a bad attempt to do so. Defederating from any instance that has a racist meme is not a good way to deal with that, simply self-moderating well on sh.itjust.works is the best way.

    As for botnets that’s another story, spam should be against the rules regardless.

    Communities within sh.itjust.works seem to be well moderated thus far, and that’s great to see.

    • Kaldo@kbin.social
      10·
      1 year ago

      That’s kind of the crux of the issue though, you keep saying “instances should self-moderate” but then you say “defederating an instance that is not properly self moderating is not a good way to deal with that”. What exactly do you propose to do then if an instance is not self moderating enough?

      • decavolt@kbin.social
        92·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. When TendieMaster69 says “self-moderate” I think defedding should 100% be a part of that self-moderation toolkit. That’s all defedding is - an instance saying “nope, we’re done with your b.s.” I don’t see why that should be off the table.

    • decavolt@kbin.social
      7·
      1 year ago

      But “shouldn’t stop them from here” and “self-moderate” are in conflict with one another. What is self-moderation if an entire instance is troll farm, or hate group? Should that self-moderation not include defedding as an option?
      If I have a party in my house and a bunch of rowdy people show up, I have a series of escalating options to stop the problem ranging from asking one of them to stop, to kicking the entire group out of my house and never letting them come back. Defedding is the last of those, and I see no reason why it shouldn’t be an option when other methods are not working.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      93·
      1 year ago

      Fuck, no.

      If someone wants a racist memes community, expect to be ostracised for it by the other instances who aren’t fuckwits.