The ENNIE Awards (the “ENNIES”) are an annual fan-based celebration of excellence in tabletop roleplaying gaming. The ENNIES give game designers, writers and artists the recognition they deserve. It is a peoples’ choice award, and the final winners are voted upon online by the gaming public.

The ENNIES were created in 2001 as an annual award ceremony, hosted by the leading D&D/d20 system fan site, EN World in partnership with Eric Noah’s Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News. The awards were owned by Russ Morrissey until 2019. As the awards have grown, the ENNIES have expanded from an Internet-based awards selection to an annual award ceremony at Gen Con. The ENNIES have also branched out from their roots as an award ceremony focused upon d20 system publishers and products to celebrate the achievements of all tabletop RPGs and the publishers and products that support them.

With award categories recognizing the components that make a game great to the types of products fans have come to love, categories for fan-based websites and much more, the ENNIES are the best way for fans to acknowledge outstanding effort from and to say “thank you” to the creators, publishers, designers and artists who make this hobby great.

https://ennie-awards.com/about/

  • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has me itching to get my copy of Trophy to the table, and to pick up Swords of the Serpentine. :)

    (Though, not to be a downer, I always take the ENNIEs with a grain of salt after Zweihander won both Product and Game of the Year.)

    • tissek@ttrpg.networkOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ENNIES is a popularity contest after all so the tastes of the masses is often dependent on who has the better (social) media coverage. And that Zweihander guy was good at social media back then.

      I wouldn’t have heard about SoS if I hadn’t stumbled on someone’s review of it, and then I went and got it. Sword and Sorcery is by far my preferred fantasy genre . Haven’t had the time to read that much of it but I have enjoyed what I have read so far. Also it being a Gumshoe game means it is easy to port to some other system, the meat and bones of it is in procedures.

      • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s true, but I also suspect there was a lot of astroturf. I mean, it beat out Blades in the Dark, which (in my admittedly subjective experience) had WAY more of a splash with a significantly larger audience. I’m not saying the ENNIEs did anything sketchy, but that I suspect the voting system is susceptible to abuse. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        Anyway. On a brighter note, I’m also a big fan of sword & sorcery, and the fact that it manages to use the Gumshoe framework (and by all accounts very successfully!) makes it extremely intriguing. :)

        • tissek@ttrpg.networkOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What! It beat out BitD? But on the other hand I didn’t notice BitD back then, could be the circles I frequented and those I played with. Zweihander for me had a much larger presence. It also tagged onto the much larger Warhammer brand which is why it was on my radar and Blades wasn’t.

          Still wouldn’t put it past the Zweihander author to use shady methods knowing what I know today.

          • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know, right? Obviously in hindsight, Blades has had a WAY bigger impact, and WAY longer shelf life. Also in hindsight, Zak S had a grudge against John Harper, and weirdly reveled in Zweihander beating Blades. And since he has a history of organizing brigades and using sockpuppet accounts…

            It’s all ultimately speculation. Like you pointed out, the buzz the two games got varied from circle to circle. I might just be bitter because I bought Zweihander based on the hype, and was sorely disappointed in what I got. :P

            • tissek@ttrpg.networkOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The main reason I got Zweihander on my radar was because one in my group was a big Warhammer fan and had bought into the kickstarter and the hype. Once material started coming out from it he started shit talking Zweihander. He too was disappointed.

              • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Unsurprising. :/ I actually wasn’t yet into Warhammer, but hey, I heard good things, I’m into OSR stuff, it was on sale… but once I started reading it, it was just a bloated and ugly. When I went to fix the bookmarks (because of course they were terrible), I realized it was very badly organized. Top to bottom, it’s a mess.

                Since it came out, the old editions have become available as official PDFs, from what I’ve heard the new edition hews closer to the older ones, and there are even other games heavily inspired by it like Warlock. I think there was a real hunger for something like old-school Warhammer FRP, but between all of these, people just had better options, so Zweihander quickly fell by the wayside.