Some mentioned the other one was old. Heres a two-day old article on the same issue.

  • random65837@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    LOL! Sure lunatic. So the criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal right? Makes no difference that its a felony for them to be in possession of a firearm is already a crime, the mag limit… That’ll stop them right?

    You’re hilarious. I’ll bet speed limits and DUI laws stop people too right? The ol’ gotta do “something” even when its proven not to work mindset huh?

    Plan your next vacation to reality.

      • random65837@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Give an example of how that’s a straw man, its literally punishing the innocent for the crimes of criminal with laws theyre already ignoring.

        Nice try.

        • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Give an example of how that’s a straw man

          I never said anything about any of this:

          • criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal

          Or this:

          • I’ll bet speed limits and DUI laws stop people too right?

          You are arguing against a position I do not hold, a strawman.

          • random65837@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If your argument is that limiting magazine capacity for people not commuting crimes, has an effect on people that ignore laws and will not produce any real life result as a consequence of that, than yes, you are.

            • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Now you’ve moved the goal posts.

              These two statements:

              • has an effect on people that ignore laws

              and

              • criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal

              are fundamentally different claims.

              • random65837@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Goal posts are exactly where they’ve always been. You want the innocent hindered/punished for the crimes of criminals with laws/regulations that only apply to those who follow laws in the first place. Law that aren’t new, and have proven useless. You’re clearly not a CA resident, or a gun owner because this is elementary school simple, yet clearly over your head.

                • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Goal posts are exactly where they’ve always been

                  Not anymore, because

                  • has an effect on people that ignore laws

                  and

                  • criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal

                  are not the same. They are fundamentally different claims. One is focused on effect, the other on intent.

                  You want the innocent hindered/punished for the crimes of criminals with laws/regulations that only apply to those who follow laws in the first place.

                  That’s not what I want.

                  You’re clearly not a CA resident, or a gun owner because this is elementary school simple, yet clearly over your head.

                  And this is an ad hominem.

                  • random65837@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago
                    • Not anymore, because

                    has an effect on people that ignore laws and

                    criminals that by definition dont follow the law and have no issues comiting murder, will swap those 30rd mags for 10’s becuase those are legal are not the same. They are fundamentally different claims. One is focused on effect, the other on intent.

                    Those are constant facts, they move nothing. Unless you’re claiming that criminals follow laws.

                    That’s not what I want.

                    Then explain why you support regulations that will only accomplish just that.

                    And this is an ad hominem.

                    No, that’s obvious. The ad-hominem would be you virtue signalling children as a way to violate the rights of the law abiding.