Google allegedly gave drivers bridge route for years despite correction requests.

  • Gordon_Freeman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How does this can happen?

    As a driver if google tells me I should cross a bridge, but there is no bridge I look for a different route. I don’t try to cross the nonexistent birdge, that’s insane

    • Sentinian@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article states it was bitchblack at 11pm with no street lights. The issue has been known since 2013 but Google hasn’t changed it despite requests.

      It’s not entirely googles fault, the bridge owner as well but both are being sued per the article

      • AmidFuror@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty sure “bitchblack” has fallen out of favor as a term to describe something very dark.

    • Bagel5941@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      “At the conclusion of the party, Mrs. Paxson took her daughters home while Mr. Paxson stayed to help clean up after the party. After Mr. Paxson assisted in the party cleanup, he drove his Jeep Gladiator towards his home in Hickory.”

      Philip Paxson wasn’t familiar with the area and didn’t know the bridge was collapsed, the lawsuit said. “Google Maps directed Mr. Paxson to travel home over the Snow Creek Bridge. Unbeknownst to Mr. Paxson, a very large section of the Snow Creek Bridge had collapsed in 2013 and was never repaired,” the lawsuit said.

      There was no artificial lighting, “and the area was pitch black at 11:00 p.m.,”

      Seems pretty simple to me. I have put complete faith in Google maps in poor lighting before and it’s literally never occurred to me that it may direct me over a bridge that doesn’t exist.

      • wagesj45@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have put complete faith in Google maps in poor lighting before

        And that is a very unsafe way to operate a two ton motor vehicle. As the driver, it is your responsibility to operate your vehicle safely. If you can’t operate it safely in the given conditions, you are obligated to not operate it. If lighting conditions are so poor, and your vehicles illumination is insufficient, stop driving.

        We test drivers and license them to make sure they know not only the rules of the road but safety measures. Putting “conplete faith” in an automated system is the very definition or irresponsible driving and should be grounds to lose ones license.

    • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Once, in the middle of the day when it was bright and shiny, I pulled into a lot. I realized it wasn’t attached to the place I wanted to go, so decided to go through the lot and head out another entrance. Except the two lots weren’t connected. In fact the lot I was in was raised about a foot higher than the other lot. My tires stopped right on the very edge. Again, this was in the middle of the day with the sun shining. And it was obvious as fuck, as well.

      You think you would notice, but the fact is your brain pulls crap like this on you all the time. Right now you can’t see the holes in your vision caused by your optic nerves. And it isn’t that your visual cortex is merely taking data from one eye to cover a deficiency in another. Close one eye and the hole is still not visible. The visual cortex and the systems it is connected to let you see what they want you to see. I am not asking how could he not notice, but rather, what was his brain doing to make him not realize. Because even in pitch black, with headlights it would still be visible that there is no bridge.

    • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You ever see that episode of The Office (US) where Michael drives into a lake because his GPS told him to? It sounds pretty ridiculous, but I have no doubt there’s people who put too much faith in their maps

      From the article, it sounds like it was too dark to see the bridge was out, but then again you shouldn’t be driving where you can’t see either

      • QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        On Lake Livingston in Texas when I was a kid there was one of the roads that went through the valley before it was a lake and was still there. Jsut went straight into the lake. Centerline was still painted on it. It was being used as a boat rampbut I was always surprised I never heard about anyone driving straight into the lake there. At theat time the GPS did show it still as a road straight through the lake which is weird because the lake was made well before GPS existed.

        Looks like now they added some artificial land and made a proper boat ramp. I think it was old 190, apparently if you have sonar you can follow the road to the old path of the river and find the old truss bridge still under there.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But it’s a bridge on a road. There’s an expectation that if it’s out there would be barriers blocking it or GPS would be updated. The local government is primarily at fault, but Google is too. It’s negligent and they should do a better job with their incorrect data reports. I’ve had more than one report get denied when I wasn’t wrong.

    • lucidmushr00m@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was dark and rainy

      Which is probably how it happened but yea doesn’t seem like Google’s fault.