• rentar42@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Given it’s position as a mostly progressive/liberal paper their line on transgender topics is weirdly backwards. And it’s not just commenters. It does match the overall atmosphere in the UK in general, but it’s extremely jarring when looking at it from the outside.

    And so that it’s not just a “I told you so”:

    • OmegaMouse@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for that. It is odd how these radical feminist views have gone so far that they loop back around to the far right. And yes it’s surprising that the Guardian is giving them a platform. I wonder why it does? Is it just the paper has always supported feminism, but the feminists that write their articles have become more radicalised over time?

      I really don’t understand how these radical feminists think that transgender rights are somehow eroding women’s rights. Every trans person I know just wants to get on with their lives, they don’t have some agenda. If you wrote an article about how gay rights are causing some issue it would be considered right-wing. So why is it different for trans rights? Crazy

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      From what I can tell, they don’t have “a line”. They are generally supportive of trans right and folks and they also acknowledge that there is debate over how some vulnerable women would still like spaces free both from men and from women who transitioned and were previously men. This is a difficult subject and I don’t think the paper is transphobic to carry the discussion. It’s what happens when the rights of two vulnerable communities collide.

        • asap@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is their opinion incorrect? I’d be interested to hear a counterpoint.

          • rentar42@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            No.

            I’m not going to “debate you bro”. Build your own opinion, read the articles I linked, try to find an argument.

            Try to find good faith. Then maybe there can be a conversation.

            What OP described is exactly how TERFs phrase their fight against trans people in public. I’m not going to engage with those arguments, because they either come from ignorance (which I’m not energetic enough to combat today) or from a place of bad faith “discussions”.

            • asap@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Oof. Wasn’t asking for a debate, simply asked your perspective.

              You know I’m not “HeartyBeast”, right?

              • rentar42@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think my position on that was made clear enough by my original post and my reply.

                You might have been asking in entirely good faith, but the issue is that this “oh, can you please explain your point of view to me” approach is so extremely frequently presented in bad faith and costs so much energy from those who care about topics like this.

                • asap@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Ok. Your first linked article is taking issue with the Guardian for saying “If a lesbian only desires same-sex dates that’s not bigotry, it’s her right”.

                  Your position is that you disagree with the Guardian here?

                  • idiomaddict@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    They actually have a lot more positive articles for trans rights (by headlines, I didn’t read them all) than I realized, but they also write stuff that is just so insulting. The constant “just because we have the belief that sex might still be relevant” is downplaying things a really disingenuous level.

                    While the article talks about lesbians, it mentions that this is all backed up legally, because the UK doesn’t allow trans women (I wonder if they allow trans men who’ve undergone medical transition) to access rape services, but they don’t criticize that or mention that trans people are twice as likely to be victims of sex crimes as cis people are.

                    They take a hard look at mermaids, which they should, mermaids seems sketchy. They don’t, however, address that LGB Alliance wants to set up a helpline for children (except to mention they need money, because of the evil trans maniacs). What happens when a confused trans kid calls them?

                    Additionally, calling a binder medically unsafe is a stretch. If you wear one that’s too small 24 hours a day, ignoring any feeling of over compression, it can fuck you up. Otherwise, they can be as safe as things like 10 cm heels, which children aren’t restricted from buying, afaik

                  • rentar42@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    And your position is that I have to materially agree with every single sentence in any content that I link to to explain a situation?

                    I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, but it seems you’re a debate-me-bro after all.

            • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I read the articles you linked, and that was the conclusion I drew. I’m not sure its helpful to accuse me of reaching them through either ‘ignorance’ or ‘bad faith’. I have empathy for the difficulties of the trans community, but I also have empathy for women who have suffered abuse.

              I’m honestly not sure how to square that circle yet. But I don’t think shutting down a conversation with ‘the paper is transphobic, full stop’ is great.

            • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              With your self-righteous attitude and allergy to contradiction you are literally proving the arguments of the far right. You are part of the reason the left cannot win elections any more. You are not helping anyone or anything.