• randomname01@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    In this hypothetical scenario this gets implemented it would certainly be standard to have a clause to protect employers against exactly that.

    • severien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Seems kinda shitty that you basically can’t move without employer’s approval.

      Also poorer people living farther away would get discriminated.

      • randomname01@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’d be fair to just keep paying the same compensation you received before moving; you could still move, but you’d have to pay the price.

        And yeah, there are still a lot of problems with this approach as long as housing is left to market forces. But those problems are inherent to free markets, not to this possible solution to another problem.