devfuuu@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agoLe torturelemmy.worldimagemessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up12.17Karrow-down129
arrow-up12.15Karrow-down1imageLe torturelemmy.worlddevfuuu@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-squarenaught@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoI’ve heard some people even use :wq over :x
minus-squareCodeBlooded@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year ago….I’ve been using :wq for years…
minus-squarenaught@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoRepent! Imagine all of the wasted productivity! Ahhhhhhhhh
minus-squarePseudoSpock@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoWhat? No “Esc. Shift+ZZ” ?
minus-squaretool@r.rosettast0ned.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoThat sounds like emacs-user talk. We don’t take kindly to you folks around these parts…
minus-squarePseudoSpock@lemmy.fmhy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·1 year agoIt’s straight up vi, bro.
minus-squareThe Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoCompositions don’t bother me. Repititions do
I’ve heard some people even use
:wqover:x….I’ve been using :wq for years…
Repent! Imagine all of the wasted productivity! Ahhhhhhhhh
What? No “Esc. Shift+ZZ” ?
That sounds like emacs-user talk. We don’t take kindly to you folks around these parts…
It’s straight up vi, bro.
This is the way
Compositions don’t bother me. Repititions do