• geosoco@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    huh? I’m guessing you didn’t mean to reply to me.

    I was asking why the OP changed the title of the article to add “son of the president”. As if it’d somehow make people care more about this total non-story.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it is a huge story. Hunter has money, so his attorneys can move the case up the chain. The court may have to rule if it is constitutional or unconstitutional for a government form to restrict gun sales to people. Hunter walks on that charge if deemed unconstitutional, and if deemed constitutional, it could maybe set precedent that the government can legally enforce stricter gun regulations.

      E.g. No assault charges in the last x amount of years unless deemed okay by a medical professional. No firearms over a certain caliber, etc.

      So for the trump appointee to win, he has to do what is good for the populous, which he can’t do. It’s against his programming. Who knows though, maybe the clock will be right at that time of day?

      • geosoco@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hear you, that would definitely make the case more interesting, if it ever gets to that. That money also means he’s way more likely for him to hire lawyers to get him off on some technicality so judges never have to take that on.