I have problems with people who abstained. The hard thing is, how do you change voter behavior?

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, but it at least prevents the appearance of a “mandate.” Trump claims that he not only won the popular vote but also the electoral college so that means we’re all totally cool with whatever he wants to do whatsoever.

      They have less of an argument if more people voted against him, but our stupid system still gave him power.

      • bishbosh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, but it at least prevents the appearance of a “mandate.”

        This is such a liberal take. They would have acted exactly the same whether they had the ‘spirit of the nation’ behind them or not. Stop picking fights of symbolic victories.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, they are not. But swinging the popular vote reduces their appearance of the public mandate. And Trump also only won by relatively small margins in a lot of the swing states for the electoral college (30k in Wisconsin, 50k in Nevada, 70k in Michigan, etc), where such additional votes matter even more.

      Every single vote on the board counts, whether or not you think it does. Not voting is intentionally silencing your voice for no reason.