cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/181146
I am assuming many of you have heard about the potential of Meta creating an ActivityPub enabled client (TheVerge, PCMag etc. have made articles). I was just wondering what people’s thoughts are on this, and if it came down to it should instances in the fediverse defederate from it considering it could be a case of Embrace, extend, extinguish.
There’s a DefederateMeta magazine at !DefederateMeta@fedia.io if you’re interested, which includes an anti-meta pact on cryptpad with the responses viewable on a seperate website if you care to see which instance admins have agreed.
I’m just curious what my fellow sh.it.heads think of this development in the fediverse, any input is appreciated!
Reposting at the request of can, within the context of c/agora should this instance defederate from any future Meta activity pub enabled clients? From my understanding it is more so a Twitter-clone and I’d argue a more severe problem for Kbin / Mastodon, but it is still worth discussing here.
Here’s the thing.
It isn’t really meta that’s the problem. As others have said, if they want to throw money at it, defederation isn’t going to stop them from causing trouble.
It’s who comes with them that’s the problem. Go look at facebook and instagram. That’s what would come with meta if they federate in one way or another.
That’s basically arguing ‘its not the fire that destroyed your house, it was the heat and smoke’
That’s a great point, because if there wasn’t a shit load of money behind FB and Insta, you wouldn’t have all those users and advertising bots.