• Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fun fact! In 2002 the US passed a law allowing themselves to invade the Hague in case any high-ranking US officials ended up on trial there.

    Which I’m sure they passed in the year between 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq just by coincidence, and they weren’t expecting any shady shit to go down at all.

    • gowan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The USA has NEVER supported the ICCJ and this was not a new policy the Bush 43 administration devised on their own.

      • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But still, quite convenient timing to pass a “Guys we’re SUPER SERIOUS about not being on the hook for war crimes” bill.

        • gowan@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but it’s like the PATRIOT Act (it’s an anagram Im just lazy). The PATRIOT Act had been kicking around DC for decades before we had an excuse to pass it. The ICCJ bill was no different.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How would that work? Wouldn’t that be an act of war unprovoked aggression per the UN charter?

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No no, don’t you know that we don’t do “war” any more? We do “operations” now. War is totally different. Then we have to obey Geneva conventions and all sorts of other hairy stuff. Our politicians have decided as long as we don’t call it “war” then we’re fine.

      • Arbiter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it would be.

        It’s geopolitical dick wagging, not a law that was actually needed or does anything.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is why I maintain that Trump will never go to prison… The u.s government itself would never allow it. They’ll likely help him stay out on appeals till he dies, that’s gonna be the worst punishment he’ll get. I think the government would have him killed and made it to look like an accident before they ever allow him to set foot in prison.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US government will allow Trump to go to an American jail. This is like ruling over like. The US government would never allow Trump to go a foreign jail, no matter how much he deserved it.

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think there are enough people in power who will use the “one of our presidents in jail will hurt our country” excuse, or they’ll fear reprisal from the maga cult, that they’ll let him walk. I hope I’m wrong, but the u.s pulls this shit all the time.