And Hannah Montana is the lie of it being accessible to new players.

  • off_brand_@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    2e is weirder and more sexualized

    My man did not play the same PF1e that I did.

    Also, both games achieve different things. Neither is "better’, you just like 1e more, congrats.

    • Dice@ttrpg.networkOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a jab at players for being overly attached to the system. Basically that pf2 players are wearing rose colored glasses.

  • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My man. The only group I’ve ever convinced to play GURPS had previously preferred Shadowrun 5e and Pathfinder 1e for all the highly specific rules. But your autism levels are clearly higher than any of us

  • Flushmaster@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    PF2e actually exists because of D&D 5e. 5e is a streamlined and (most people believe) improved version of 3.5, which is exactly what PF1e is under a different label. But to appeal to their rebellious hipster demographic the new PF had to be different and innovative. So you get a bunch of overly complex rules for options and the sake of just being like D&D but still totally not D&D. The result is a decent game that definitely isn’t 5e because it intentionally trades off most of the streamlining that makes 5e more approachable for the sake of complexity and options.

    Basically it’s a bunch of pretentious hipster BS.