Paqui, the maker of extremely spicy tortilla chips marketed as the “One Chip Challenge,” is voluntarily pulling the product from shelves after a woman said her teenage son died of complications from consuming a single chip.

The chips were sold individually, and their seasoning included two of the hottest peppers in the world: the Carolina Reaper and the Naga Viper.

Each chip was packaged in a coffin-shaped container with a skull on the front.

Lois Wolobah told NBC Boston that her 14-year-old son, Harris Wolobah, ate the chip Friday, then went to the school nurse with a stomachache. Wolobah said Harris — a sophomore at Doherty Memorial High School in Worcester, Massachusetts — passed out at home that afternoon. He was pronounced dead at the hospital later that day, she said.

Until sales of the product were suspended, Paqui’s marketing dared people to participate in the challenge by eating a chip, posting pictures of their tongues on social media after the chip turned it blue and then waiting as long as possible to relieve the burn with water or other food.

The challenge has existed in some form since 2016.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s the example you want to give in support of your argument that this chip should be within reach of kids? A highly-regulated product that can only be purchased by adults?

    And where did I say it should be illegal? I said it doesn’t need to be on shelves and even implied they did nothing wrong legally (the mom shouldn’t be able to sue)

    What exactly are you defending here?

    • Shalakushka@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally any food can send you to the hospital. Taking it off of shelves because one person had a reaction is an overreaction.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t get why you think this is such a pearl clutching opinion when you yourself compared it to alcohol. I guess I just don’t understand what stance you’re taking. Do YOU think minors should be able to buy booze?

        • Shalakushka@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, I think adults should be able to buy booze and children shouldn’t. We should not have to modify the options available to adults to suit children. Your logic is that no R rated movies should exist because they are not suitable for one section of society (children). When I point the absurdity of that logic out, you accuse me of wanting children to be able to drink alcohol (???). My logic is that it’s stupid to ban something for everyone because one person had a reaction.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you misinterpreted my point, that is…not the I used at all. I never once claimed that any of those things - chip included - should be outright banned.

            YOU drew the comparison to alcohol, I was applying YOUR logic for chip accessibility (lol sounds like we’re talking tech) to it.

            Now you’ve added R rated movies so…where they check for ID and don’t let unaccompanied kids in. You’ve been arguing my point the whole time…that maybe there are things kids shouldn’t be able to buy for themselves…

              • glimse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It KNOW it means I think they shouldn’t be on a shelf where a kid can grab it and ring up at self checkout. I’m talking grocery stores, convenience stores, etc. I have no problem with it being sold at adult-focused stores like liquor stores, head shops, etc. Or ya know, it’s 2023…lots of products like this sold exclusively on the Internet.

                Less-damaging products have been outright banned before and I’m not advocating for the same for this, just that it shouldn’t be so easy for children to get their hands on.