Sen. John Fetterman offered a message Wednesday to House Republicans considering impeaching President Joe Biden: “Go ahead, do it. I dare you.”

Speaking to reporters in his Senate office, the Pennsylvania Democrat suggested that the impeachment push by Republicans on the other side of the Capitol was meant to deflect from the mountain of legal problems facing former President Donald Trump.

“Your man has what, three or four indictments now?” Fetterman said. “Trump has a mug shot and he’s been impeached twice.”

“Sometimes you just gotta call their bullshit,” he said.

The first-term senator went on to say that a Biden impeachment "would just be like a big circle jerk on the fringe right,” and “would diminish what impeachment really means.”

Note: As pointed out by reddig33 in comments, this is an old photo. Here’s a couple examples of his new look.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          1 year ago

          this is why the conservative perverts voted for the fake tv businessman who does crimes (Trump) rather than the real businessman (Romney) who does things that should be crimes.

        • meyotch@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am part of the electorate and I do not crave lies. There are dozens of us. Dozens!

        • lingh0e@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Conservatives: We love Trump because he tells it like it is.

          Fetterman: ::speaks his mind::

          Conservatives: No, not like that.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which is a fucking joke given Trump’s… everything.

        Fetterman is more mentally fit to serve than most of the octogenarians that have held office recently.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find it refreshing to be honest. He’s definitely not weaseling the answer with slippery language.

      • Fuck Yankies@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being a fan of Diogones the cynic I to hate vanity. Nowhere is this more apparent than in congress or the house of representatives.

        Quoteth Diogones: “in a rich man’s home there’s nowhere to spit but his face”, and republicans are trells, slaves to their masters and as vein as the emperor’s New clothes, while pretending to be “rebellious”. A bunch of posers, really.

    • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that if the Republicans don’t manage to turn the US into a one-party state, Federman’s got a bright future, and his plain-speaking nature is part of that.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have they found anything they could actually impeach Biden over, or do they just hope that something comes out of the nowhere once they start the process? This whole impeachment stuff sound to me just like Trumps lawsuits for “stealing my vote” and the whole “I’ll hold a press conference where I will present irrefutable evidence” stuff.

    • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both. They scream “BiDeN cRiMe FaMiLy!” To distract from trumps corrupt ass kids being literally employed in the White House. Like dude said trump has 4 indictments…

      However I am also sure they are desperate to find anything they can twist into scandal regardless of substance. They investigated Clinton for 25 years before settling on a blowjob.

      Remember Trump blackmailing Zelensky to make up dirt on Biden? Nothing. Remember Hunter’s laptop? Nothing. They will keep fishing because they would prefer that over doing jackshit for the average citizen.

    • justastranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      McCarthy has admitted a few different times now that they have literally zero evidence to serve as a basis for an investigation or implement

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure they’ll eventually find something. The Clinton impeachment investigation didn’t set out to find anything about his affairs, it was some land deal that turned out to be on the up and up after all.

      The point is, they just want to investigate, bog the White House down with discovery, leak anything embarrassing (I’m sure there’s a ton more Hunter stuff to leak), and I’m sure they’ll eventually find something that sorta kinda looks like a crime (or obstruction), because if you investigate anyone you’ll find something eventually.

      It’s basically about hurting Biden politically, and painting Biden as a criminal, so the uninformed voter can just say ‘they’re both the same’.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The big problem here is that you have way too many uninformed voters in your country. Which is always a weak base for a working democracy.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not my country, but yeah, Americans are stupid (and are kept that way by the media).

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        some land deal that turned out to be on the up and up

        The most hilarious part of the land deal was that the Clintons lost money on it. Like, that’s not how corruption works.

    • Saneless@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      They just want it as a historical anecdote when they talk about presidents being impeached. They’re really, really sore about Trump going through 2 of them

      Shame the system is rigged to allow your friends on half the jury

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Im from near where he was mayor. When we were trying to get mandatory paid sick time passed in the city of Pittsburgh John came and walked the line with us. He once went on the daily show to outline his plan to get a subway to open in the little hood-ass town he was mayor of, because there was no place in that town where you could get ready to eat food and he was trying to stop tax money leaking out to other towns. Dude has a tattoo for each person who died by violence in his town while he was mayor. He’s no bullshit.

      • poppy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        At first when I read subway I thought you mean public transport and thought “that’s no small task!” When I realized you meant Subway the sandwich shop I was sad that a town didn’t even have a Subway??? They’re a dime a dozen!

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, the sandwich shop. All of Pittsburgh got hecked up pretty good when steel manufacturing went to places where workers have no rights like China and Alabama. Some neighborhoods ended up in a spiral where a lot of people moved out, so they didn’t have any money to do anything with, so more people left and people who used to spend money in the community now had to spend it elsewhere (depressing both income and tax revenue in the community). John’s old neighborhood, Braddock, was kinda famous among Pittsburgh neighborhoods for getting absolutely smacked by this cycle.

          • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I lived in Pittsburgh for a decade, and man, you’re totally right - there were (are?) some serious ghost towns in the area. I recall a trip to Ford City where it was like “here is a town, there is a neoclassical courthouse, there are streetlights and pavement and buildings, but no cars or people.” Went to a bar there and there was literally nothing inside that would let you know you weren’t in the year 1985 (when it was 200X). Even the prices were out of the past. It was totally surreal.

            • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Have you ever seen the movie The Deer Hunter? It’s set during the Vietnam war, and it’s shot in Pittsburgh’s Polish Hill neighborhood. It was shot in 1978, 45 years ago. Polish Hill still looks like that today.

              • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I heard Polish Hill was getting gentrified like the “East End” aka the side of East Liberty that bougies decided to rename so their friends wouldn’t think they live in the scary ghetto with GASP… (whisper) black people. I used to hang out at Gooskies back in the day, though I heard it might be closing or closed? EDIT: I have not watched it but now it’s on my list, thanks! EDIT 2: Man you also brought back some memories of Nico’s Recovery Room - where you’d have blue collar guys side by side with Carnegie Mellon future millionaires. Fucking great.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My money is on McCarthy running the inquiry so the far right will be forced to fund the government. Can’t run a government inquiry if the government has shut down. MTG has already taken the bate and has said she’d fund the government in exchange for an inquiry.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      He had a son who’s a fuckup. Not like Trump, whose children are definitely not fuckups.

      Not fuckups at all.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know we’re supposed to just mock the question, but being serious and looking at right wing media enough to try to figure out what the claims are beneath all the hyperbole…

        It looks like the claim underneath the hyperbole and bullshit is that Biden has been using Hunter as an intermediary for influence peddling, pay-for-access and other things that are or are tantamount to bribery.

        Given where it’s coming from, I assume it’s basically a conspiracy theory with little solid behind it, but they’re explicitly claiming more than his son having a laptop.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Strictly speaking, not really true. “high crimes and misdemeanors” I believe is what the constitution says, which unfortunately boils down to “whatever Congress has the desire and political capital to punish” which historically does mean that Fetterman is right. Republicans would likely pay some amount of political price for voting an impeachment with no real or popular basis.

      • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Correct. They also don’t need anything other than political capital to launch an impeachment inquiry and just generally be a nuisance.

        This is also literally the only reason Trump survived impeachment. Turns out, impeachment means fuck all in a minority-rule-by-design system in which almost nothing is clearly spelled out, and said system is the only check on what passes muster.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, a president can actually be impeached for any reason at all. They just won’t be removed unless the opposing party has a supermajority.

  • kalleboo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can the US just institute a yearly recurring “impeachment day” holiday where you impeach the current president? It will make things so much easier to schedule around, and we know that from now on every president from both parties will be threatened by impeachment anyway.

    • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do realize this would cause impeachment to mean nothing right? It’s not a frivolous tool however much some people want it to be.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When one party refuses to hold their own guy accountable then it is indeed a frivolous tool. Trump obviously should have been removed…so what do impeachment do?

        Not much in the mind of the average texan.

        • Okkai@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s incorrect. The goal of the GOP is to delegitimize it. They’re just upset because their guy was the only president to be impeached twice for legitimate reasons.