• SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    In practice, I agree with you. The transporter scans, disintegrates, and reconstructs the thing being transported. But when the thing being transported is reconstructed at a subatomic level it is effectively identical.

    I can imagine the society we see in startrek having already worked through the moral and philosophical implications. I would have loved to see that addressed in an episode tho.

    • Eva!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Outside of measure of a man-type episodes, I don’t think they’ve ever had a super in-depth discussion on selfhood and the soul as characters see it in universe. , but it seems like materialism is the generally accepted philosophy. Post Enterprise, people who have hangups on the transporters (perhaps more based in dualism) are treated as weirdos.

      More evidence for materialism: Q, the godlike being who might be able to tell the difference, treats Golem-Picard the same entity. And last I checked nobody’s going around saying that Thomas Riker and William Boimler are p-zombies.

      (I guess Gray Tal is the odd man out, since there was some consciousness that got somehow ceremonially split off before shoving it in a golem. Maybe that’s just trill symbiont weirdness though).

      • SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that everyone treats Golem-Picard as True-Picard felt to me like confirmation that, in the ST universe, what makes you you is your mind. Memories, thought patterns, etc… I know it was tv-show hand wavery but the fact that no one mourned the death of their friend, or really ever once questioned the validity of the golem taking his place bothered me a little.

        • FormerGameDev@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also, M’Benga’s daughter is still the same person, despite being an energy being now, without a physical body.

          If my consciousness is continuing, especially into a physical form that looks exactly like myself, what practical difference does it make?

      • LibraryLass@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        but it seems like materialism is the generally accepted philosophy.

        Which is absurd as souls objectively exist in Star Trek and at least two major species objectively have them-- which implies most do.

    • concrete_baby@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is one carbon atom the same as another carbon atom, philosophically? Can you keep your identity when all your atoms are replaced by other atoms of the same kind? It’s the ship of Theseus problem

      • LibraryLass@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Irrelevant to the transporter as the same matter is moved by the matter stream and reassembled in the same order. This is less asking if the ship of Theseus is the same ship after the hull and the mast were replaced and more asking if my kitchen table is still the same after I took the leaf out, folded the legs in, put it in a truck, moved to a new house, and set it back up

    • LibraryLass@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not just effectively identical, it’s completely identical. The same matter, the same quantum state, the same consciousness.