• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t see many options between asking for a birthdate and asking for ID for this problem. I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Facebook/Meta has developed software to estimate the age from a video.

      I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

      Comes with the territory. The point is to control who has access to what information so that they don’t get wrong ideas.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 days ago

        if you think AI software will be able to differentiate between a 15 year old and 16 year old then I have this cool bridge in Brooklyn that you might be interested in.

        This is delusional to the point where it feels like we’re literally devolving.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        Trusting your face to Facebook is just as terrifying, thanks.

        (Plus I have concerns as someone who still looks teenage in her 20s)

    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t see many options between asking for a birthdate and asking for ID for this problem. I don’t see any way that this can be enforced that isn’t problematic.

      The senate inquiry outlined the two likely solutions :

      1. Uploading ID to the website.

      2. 3D face scanning. This will include continual monitoring so if another person comes into view they will have to face scan in. Remember, its prohibited for chidren to even watch prohibited content with their parents.

      • copd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        How can it possibly be legal to 3D face scan a child, especially if it needs to be authenticated by a remote server somewhere.

        I can only ever see option 1 working

    • Wooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      A large part of this will help maintain liability for harm to young people. How ages is verified is irrelevant

    • Clanket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Problematic for who, the tech companies? They’re practically printing money. Let them spend it on actual solutions to issues that are causing problems for the World.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        It forces them to implement solutions that make having anonymous accounts impossible.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Problematic for the children who are having their rights taken away. This change bans children from connecting with their friends in other countries, other states, and even other cities.

        Even something as simple as hopping in a voice call with your squad to play Deep Rock Galactic is now illegal for 15 year olds. That’s ridiculous. The fact that they can break the law is great, but they shouldn’t have to break the law in order to do something so harmless.

        What about using Zoom to speak to a doctor or therapist? What about contacting queer support resources through social media? What about using a text based suicide hotline? According to the law, that’s social media.