Does it feel like your X account belongs to you and you can do whatever you want with it? That’s not true, according to a new court filing from the social media company formerly known as Twitter. It’s an argument that X is making in order to throw a wrench in The Onion’s recent purchase of InfoWars, the conspiracy theory media company run by Alex Jones. And it’s a great reminder that you don’t actually own what you think you own in the digital age.

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    You do have some control, in the form of copyright. Also the analogy doesn’t hold up well since you’re not using their “pen” and they only let you reach inside through the window. And the audience is outside the house.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      26 days ago

      And to continue that analogy- Twitter didn’t assign the name, the user created it so they hold copyright on the name.

    • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      26 days ago

      Except when you enter the home, you accepted the TOS that transfers copyright to the owner of the home.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Nope.

        as a user, “you retain your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Services. What’s yours is yours you own your Content (and your photos and videos are part of the Content),” although you also grant Twitter a license to use the content, which authorizes it “to make your Content available to the rest of the world and to let others do the same.” Based on this language, other twitter users are also licensed to copy and redistribute your posts by “retweeting” them.

        https://copyrightalliance.org/faqs/tweets-protected-copyright/

        • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          26 days ago

          Really ? I think you’ll find that clause means you do not own copyright to anything you post on X.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            26 days ago

            Really? How do you get that from “you retain your rights and give Twitter a license to use your content”? Retaining rights literally means not giving them up.

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          26 days ago

          Congratulations on reading the twitter TOS. Now tell me if it is legal for a company to lay claim on copyright via a TOS.

            • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              26 days ago

              I thought we were talking about who legally can lay claim on copyrights in the hypothetically house with a whiteboard? i’m not the one lost with the program.

              • trolololol@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                26 days ago

                You see, x is the pen, Infowars is the ink and we’re the contents of the water bowl all along

                Skibidi dibidi bop