• circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves, so I dont really see the logic here.

    • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It takes people to enact policies around the -isms and to make the -isms themselves

      The OP said “…-ism is the real cancer upon society”. I was pointing out that people are the real cancer of society. It doesn’t matter what “-ism” you want to stand behind, there will always be issues because humanity is fundamentally broken.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        humanity is fundamentally broken

        I’d argue that humanity and an -ism aren’t that different in this context – arbitrary linguistic form aside, they both refer to abstract collectives.

        But ultimately, I still don’t see the logic in separating humanity from the systems it created and uses. Fixing one fixes the other, in bilateral fashion.