• pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Watching David Brooks, of all people, develop more introspection and self-awareness than the entire Democratic party leadership has been a real trip.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      Don’t assume that he actually developed any self-awareness. I’m sure he takes no responsibility for the horrible columns he’s written over the past few decades. To him, the facts on the ground changed, and certainly he never got anything wrong.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I know nothing of his work, but my immediate assumption is that he’s just a contrarian asshole that has no actual principles.

      In media (as in politics), this kind of thing is almost always a product of cynical expediency rather than sincere introspection.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        He’s an old-school Regan conservative who writes a column for the New York Times. He also does a weekly PBS news segment; it used to be with this even older liberal named David Brooks, but he retired, and now it’s with a young liberal who’s so moderate they barely even disagree.

        Funny enough, I actually don’t think he’s being contrarian. He was on PBS Newshour for their election night coverage, and he seemed shook. The next day, he commented on Twitter something to the effect of, “maybe the answer is that the Democrats need to pick someone that makes people like me unconformable.” I think he’s watched his economic outlook completely win American politics over the last 40 years, only to find the prize at the end was fascism.