These are not the the developer tools you think they are.
  • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.worldEnglish
    271·
    2 个月前

    I mean programming language package managers are just begging to be used as an attack vector. This is why package management should be an OS responsibility across the board and only trusted package sources and publishers should ever be allowed.

    • Reptorian@lemmy.zipEnglish
      81·
      2 个月前

      There’s also the alternatives of making your own library. I’m happy to use minimal amount of 3rd parties and just make my own instead.

    • Kairos@lemmy.todayEnglish
      7·
      2 个月前

      Or at the very fucking least require specific versions with checksums, like golang.

      • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        2 个月前

        I really think every package repository should be opt in and every publisher should be required to verify their identity and along with checksum verification for the downloaded files.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      2 个月前

      I’m not sure I understand what you are saying. What part of the OS should managed the packages? The creators aka. Microsoft/Linux foundation/Apple/Google, the distributor, or a kernel module? What about cross platform package managers like Nuget, gradle, npm?

      • tekato@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        2 个月前

        What part of the OS should managed the packages?

        The OS package manager. This is already a thing with Python in apt and pacman, where it will give you a fat warning if you try to install a package through pip instead of the actual OS package manager (i.e. pacman -Syu python-numpy instead of pip install numpy)