• InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The far right keeps trying to take over, and keeps collapsing into its own incompetence immediately after.

    They know longer know how to rule and modern parliamentary systems make them much less able to govern.

    Germany will be a disaster, their economy is finished for at least a decade, but that’s … not terribly serious, they’ll re-form after a while, hopefully after we’ve fixed the EU.

    Yeah that latter one is a bit fantastic, but considering how much room there is for change right now we actually could have some things get better.

    Austria has been flirting with the far-right my whole life, the strain runs REALLY deep.

    If America goes Trump then things could get very dark, but otherwise I’m pretty sure we’ll manage to figure things out over the next decade, things are still vastly better in both Europe and America than anywhere else and while people don’t like it, they’ll be less happy with the alternatives.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m sorry, but you’re deluding yourself if you don’t think that the gurrent system won’t collapse under climate change if we don’t have fundamental changes.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Meh, I think we can adjust.

        I think most other systems would be worse, and the system itself is entirely irrelevant.

        The only thing that will save us is science, climate change probably doesn’t work the way you think it does, it’s complex and we have room to work if the assholes get off our backs.

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            We went from learning from books to having access to the entire sum knowledge of humanity in my pocket instantly in my lifetime.

            Science is truly powerful, and I can say that because I’m literally arguing with you over it.

            Geoengineering is basic science, the only thing blocking us from doing it are all the morons who don’t understand how it works and believe “ONLY GAWD” is in charge of the weather, and the other group of morons who don’t understand how it works and thing we should all run back to live in caves.

            Read Malthus, we should never have made it this far.

              • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                You have no idea about complex systems, climate and chaos theory. Geo-engineering is siake oil the destructive status quo is trying to sell us while the rich build post-apocalyptic bunkers on New Zealand.

                Yes, it’s complicated, you know what else is a complex system? The human body. Better not ever take any medicine or anything really.

                We predicted climate change, we can use the same techniques to stop it.

                I like how geo-engineering is snake oil, while instead losing 3/4 of the population and having the rest live like cavemen is somehow the rational and safe choice.

                We can’t sustain the current population on the planet, so either we figure out how to fix that problem, or we get rid of a lot of population, you’re welcome to volunteer.

                  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 days ago

                    You clearly do not understand what eugenics is, and I was literally arguing against that, as that is the only logical conclusion to keep the planet at its natural human carrying capacity.

                    Have you not thought through the consequences of your beliefs? Do you not realize reducing human industry and agriculture to “sustainable levels” means dramatically reducing human population because we cannot remotely sustain what we have now?

                    Do you know where the fertilizer used to make the majority of our food from otherwise marginally arable land comes from?