• akd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Counterpoint: it’s indispensable and nothing really fills the same niche.

    • 257m@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree that make is confusing at first but I don’t think it should fall out of use. It’s a great tool that I use everyday it is far simpler than its competitors once you get used to it. It is basically glorified bash scripting.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it can’t handle spaces and tabs without causing a crisis, it doesn’t belong on this side of 1989.

        • 257m@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah that was annoying when I first found out about that but I use tabs for indentation anyways so it doesn’t make a difference for me.

    • r1veRRR@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, yet I also see no good universal alternative. Every language has a nice tool to do things in it’s ecosystem, but the moment you need to coordinate two languages or go beyond simple stuff, make is the only good option.

      • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep. And honestly most language specific versions of make still have glaring missing features. Which doesn’t matter, until when it really matters.

        I want to embrace a make replacement, but if the pattern holds, they will be prying make out of my cold dead hands to make me presentable for my funeral.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This comment fits the spirit of the question better than anything else in here, I will say that.

    • normalmighty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meanwhile, Windows has become drastically better for development over the past few years. There are still some drawbacks, but a ton of the anti windows circlejerking in tech spaces is caused by people who haven’t touched windows as a dev environment in 10+ years.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seconding WSL, but that kinda proves the point. The solution to making Windows dev better was to add Linux.

          • Lil' Bobby Tables@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            No disrespect, but i must disagree.

            My last experience with WSL, about a month ago on Win 11, had it a far cry from GNU/Linux. They don’t even have a shoe-in for udev yet, and as a multimedia guy, that makes it almost unusable.

          • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So Windows is better than Linux because it allows you to use a restricted version of Linux?

            • And the full version of windows. Honestly I love Linux with Wine for the same reason. I just encounter more hiccups that way rather than the WSL route. It’s just more complicated to emulate GUIs.