Just curious because I don’t see people talk about it a lot.

  • spizzat2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The transition from analog to digital really hurt my desire to watch OTA TV (you caught me! I’m not under 25).

    With analog broadcast, any weak signal or interference produced a little bit of static, but you could still see and hear what was being said. With digital, any weak signal means dropped frames and silence or weird glitches. You completely lose what’s happening. Even with a powered antenna, I have frequent issues with weak signal. I could probably try to get a rooftop antenna installed, but there’s no guarantee it would be any better. It’s just easier to find other entertainment at this point.

    • yannic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Ditto. We went from having five channels, one snowy on a bad day, plus a bonus 6th channel when the stars aligned, to two channels at best.

      The broadcasters and regulators took a basic fact about digital signals “We can get a better quality signal with less transmission power” and saw it as a challenge to set up their digital transmitters with the most conservative estimate of minimum power required. I haven’t studied well enough for my amateur radio exam to know if I’m comparing apples to oranges, but I’m still shocked to see descriptions of transmitter power go from 100kW in one case to below 20kW.

    • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I hear that. We have an attic yagi aimed directly at Seattle from 10 miles away, and we still get the occasional dropout even on our strongest signals.

      Still when it works, it works really well. We watch Nature and Nova on Sundays, and the wildlife footage looks incredible.