• TheHalc@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    More homes being built should be celebrated, regardless of whether they’re intended for the rental market or not.

    More rental homes means cheaper rent, means less profitable buy-to-let, means cheaper homes.

    • christophski@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      means cheaper rent

      Have you met big corporations? Just because that aught to be e how it works, doesn’t mean it will

      • david@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Fun fact: John Lewis isn’t a typical corporation, it’s a partnership, and its employees are the partners. When they do well, they don’t pay dividends, they pay percentage bonuses across the entire workforce.

        Gives me hope that they might be trying to do the right thing. Obviously they might just be attempting to make more profit, but John Lewis has very good customer service indeed in my admittedly very limited experience.

      • TheHalc@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s simple supply and demand. Even if John Lewis decides to charge high rent on these specific homes, the additional supply will reduce demand across the market, which means landlords will have to ask for less rent if they want to be able to fill their properties.

        The more homes there are on the market, the lower rent/home prices will be.

        Free markets aren’t the answer to all the world’s problems, but they can be part of the solution - as long as they’re properly regulated.