Search on Telegram is more powerful than in other messaging apps because it allows users to find public channels and bots. Unfortunately, this feature has been abused by people who violated our Terms of Service to sell illegal goods.

To further deter criminals from abusing Telegram Search, we have updated our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, ensuring they are consistent across the world. We’ve made it clear that the IP addresses and phone numbers of those who violate our rules can be disclosed to relevant authorities in response to valid legal requests.

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    All completely irrelevant to most people. Nobody they know is on those platforms.

    There are only two alternatives to the Big Tech messengers that are anywhere near critical mass: Signal and the shady one we’re talking about here.

    Though I would love Matrix to go mainstream.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is sadly the exact reason it will stay like this. People can’t reach me because i don’t use WhatsApp? Well bad luck. Use a better app or just don’t. I can’t reach them because they only use WA? What a bummer but so be it.

      As long as people install WhatsCrapp because some distant aunt still uses it for the xmas-greetings, it will continue to be #1.

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I remember the times where we didn’t have a tiny computer with us all day to be reachable. And if I’d be lonely because i don’t give a rats ass about WA, fb and the likes, that’d be indeed lonely but not due to that

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Possibly unsolvable given its distributed nature. Seems like there will be at least some small cost to pay for that benefit.

    • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I feel like there needs to be an incentive in mind for those apps to bring in ppl. People care about privacy but won’t even delete FB, let alone use a different messaging app

      • 01011@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If they cared about privacy then they wouldn’t use a searchable public database like FB.

        • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think there’s misconceptions, trust being put in the wrong place, unawareness involved, or simply they don’t think it through, rather than not caring (anectodal/IMO). E.g. “I don’t have anything to hide, so what if they collect everything”.

          If we could build a tool to gather such info, that’s easily accessible and for free, to show all the data available on you in the marketplace - that might make them uncomfortable. And then perhaps they’ll start to try and understand why they’re uncomfortable, and why this is bad.

    • erenkoylu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nobody they know is on those platforms.

      Nobody is on Signal either.