• acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So like killing a “handful” of Israeli civilians would be “exceptionally good” if the target was a bunch of IDF reservists?

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, yeah. The tragic answer is that civilian casualties are inevitable in war, unfortunately.

      According to a UN meeting from 2022, 90% of war casualties globally are civilians. That’s not to say that’s an acceptable ratio, in fact it’s horrifying, but it does show that a ratio of “a handful” to “a bunch” is quite a lot better than the average.

      https://press.un.org/en/2022/sc14904.doc.htm

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s never good, but when Hezbollah chose to restart the violence they knew it was never going to be without collateral

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Israel has been massing forces on the Lebanon border and saying they will invade for months now. At what point is the Lebanese government allowed to defend itself?

        • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          2 months ago

          Israel and Hezbollah have always had forces on the border staring at eachother.

          After Hezbollah broke that status quo, Israel has been threatening to invade if they didn’t stop.

          Can you explain why you’re blaming Israel for responding more than Hesbollah for starting it?