• Veraticus@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s much more difficult to reach and sustain 30 mph on a pedal bike, and if you’re doing that you’re typically quite invested in it. E-bikes on the other hand it’s really easy to get to a very high speed, and I frequently see people doing it while on their phone, without wearing a helmet, and/or with additional passengers.

    I think a little bit of education here could go a long way.

    • thejevans@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I couldn’t agree more. Impact danger roughly scales like velocity^2, so a 30mph crash is about twice as bad as a 21mph one, all else being equal. The easier it is to get up to and maintain 28mph or more, the more likely it is that people will get in dangerous crashes.

    • 30p87@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then the worried parents should either properly educate their children about their safety behaviour, not whine about it.

      • thejevans@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        Solutions to systemic problems that rely on personal responsibility tend to have very low efficacy.

        • 30p87@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was more focused on the “without helmet, looking at phone” part. As a parent, it should be no surprise for them if their children end up with permanent brain damage if neglecting security completely.

          • thejevans@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The parent in the article had no idea their child was riding without a helmet, and there is no reason to believe they did not teach their child to ride with a helmet.

            If the goal is to actually reduce harm, infrastructure changes will have a far larger impact than education/information campaigns to convince kids and parents to be safer. This has been shown many times over by the NHTSA and the WHO.

            Interactions with cars make for many more conflict opportunities during rides. Shared paths with pedestrians in high traffic areas do the same, but with much lower consequences. Dockless electric bike/scooter companies encourage adhoc rides which drastically reduce the chance that a given rider will have proper safety gear, and increases the likelihood of riding under the influence of drugs/alcohol. Having to deal with lots of intersections with stop lights/signs further increases conflict opportunities.

            Separate, protected, and streamlined infrastructure for micromobility will go much further to protect people.

      • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean this is easy to say about everything. If people are annoyed at car accidents, they should teach their children to drive cars better rather than whine about it!

        At some point we do decide it’s society’s collective responsibility to ensure that something is safe, understanding that maybe not all parents will rise to the level of quality we expect. I think we’re there for ebikes.

        • 30p87@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was more focused on the “without helmet, looking at phone” part. As a parent, it should be no surprise for them if their children end up with permanent brain damage if neglecting security completely.