• ravhall@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’ve taken the conversation and turned it into something that allows you to argue online to make yourself feel better about yourself.

    I feel sorry for you, because nothing you say could ever hurt me, but you keep trying so hard.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d say nice try, but it isn’t.

      I keep making the same point. You can’t let go and stop replying out of like… spite, or something?

      Nothing to it. I’m not trying to insult you, but guess you are me.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not trying to change th3 subject mr “cops won’t get away with anything in my house”

          Now I realise it’s a different country, but here’s my personal experience.

          https://www.hs.fi/suomi/art-2000009654524.html

          In Finland. And no-one fucking believes me here. Despite having supreme court documents to show. And that’s only a part of the illegal shit I got them on, as they forcibly prevented me fron filming.

          • ravhall@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I see. It’s a language barrier, and you took the “get away with” as a serious statement of getting away with a crime when I mean it like: “people cannot get into my house without being on camera”

            Problem solved.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              You use “being on camera” to imply that since they’re on camera, they’ll face consequences for whatever they might do.

              With law enforcement, that isn’t nearly as probable as you think. I hope you have those feeds recording to a server that isn’t located on the same premises, at the very least. Even if you have the material though, it usually doesn’t mean a thing. Cops can justify pretty much anything in the US, and the justice system tends to go their way. Sure, you can show a few examples of cops actually sentenced, but for each one, there’s at least a dozen cases of officers who got off scot-free or with a warning, and a hundred more who weren’t even investigated.

              And as to your pitiful attempts at insults with your assumption that your English is better than mine? I’ve more than likely used English longer than you. More than you. In addition, I speak another language on a native level and several others on a customer service level. How many do you speak?

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Ah, so… what exactly is the reason that you think having video of cops makes you safe?

                  You’re trying to avoid seeming foolish. Like when you tried to correct my English.

                  So… how many languages do you speak?

                  • ravhall@discuss.online
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I never said it made me safe, I just said I have a lot of cameras. You took my comment, added your own thoughts to it, and then attacked me to make yourself feel something inside.

                    If it wasn’t misinterpreted, then you’re just fabricating information because you desire an argument.

                    Kinda sad really.