• recklessengagement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    Remember that anything “created” by an AI cannot be copyrighted, so the fact that there’s a label representing them is concerning… and possibly actionable

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      28 days ago

      Not Actionable… you can sell things that don’t have copyright it just means anyone can sell it, you could theoretically rip the song straight from the internet and resell it on the same platform right next to them (unless any human creativity is involved then that has copyright )

      • ayaya@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        27 days ago

        (unless any human creativity is involved then that has copyright )

        This is the part people usually forget when they spout “it can’t be copyrighted.” If a human edits the output in some capacity then that is still copyrighted. It’s not really the gotcha a lot of people seem to think it is.

        • Instigate@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          And that edit can be as minute as changing a single bit of data that is imperceptible to the human ear. As long as a human being has put input into it, they’ve edited it, and there’s copyright that can be protected.

    • quafeinum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Yes with consumer spending at an all time low the world government will decide that in order to keep the status quo intact there has to be an alternative model. Some entrepreneur will come up with the idea of ‚buyBots‘ who are anthropomorphic androids that will get issued a governmental credit card and who’s only goal is to keep dying strip malls alive by roaming the halls and mindlessly buy random stuff 24/7. funnily enough for some unknown reason these bots will for randomly form small groups of 3-5 bots and if one group happens to run into another they will throw their arms in the air, screech joyfully and then merge into a horde of buy bots. This excerpt was written by myAssLLM, if you like it give it an ass up.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Y’know where AI music isn’t ending up? In my compact disc collection. (Unless I decide it’s really good!)

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    27 days ago

    Is that why most of random music all sounds like the same Indie, portlandia, coffee house, folksy, wah wah, almost whispering songs?

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      U mean you don’t like everything sounding like it belongs in an apple commercial?

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    I don’t mind AI music when for example played in the background of YouTube video. That’s a neat use case, because otherwise you would need to deal with Copyright holders for each piece of music, and that sucks.

    But I’d still rather listen to regular music made by human artists, because at the end do we all want to be just humans that the only thing we pursue from life is to consume AI ‘art’? Fuck that dystopic future.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      I think you helped me figure out where I stand on AI. What is “the thing”? Did AI create “the thing” or was it a tool to help the creation? Part of a YouTube video is a perfect example. If I want music to set a mood, and I didn’t have anything specific in mind, fine. That’s about 5% of “the thing” and I can understand using a new tool for the job. But all the random shitty AI-generated pictures floating around social media where that’s the entirety “the thing”? They can fuck off.

      Basically, do things for the human, not the bots or the clicks. Unfortunately I don’t think we’re far off from Dead Internet Theory - we have LLMs creating content for SEO. Basically one bot creating content to please another bot. The human element has become an afterthought.

      Anyway, thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

  • eldain@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    AI can only make mediocre music, the average song with average text, it couldn’t invent the next bohemian rhapsody, whatever you ask it to do will be met with a statistical mean of it’s training data. Thus average depthless music. We only need a license that pays the electricity bill instead of making too much money. I hope it makes artists get creative again to compete. Anything above average music would do.

      • eldain@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        27 days ago

        I’m disappointed in the abilities of current AI and even more disappointed that pile of trash is still beating humans because they decided to optimize music so much towards mainstream average likings that it can indeed be generated. Don’t you think the music industry deserves this?

        • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          We’re going to continue to be disappointed by AI artwork in every form because you can’t just artificially create an amalgamation of music and expect it to be any good.

          The AI hype is going to die a quick death, in my opinion, and I don’t even think we’re that far off from it. Attempting to remove the human element from artistic creation is a fool’s errand, and the sooner it fails and dies the better off we’ll all be.

          • eldain@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            27 days ago

            I think it will at least find a niche where it outperformes humans, like generating lobby/elevator music or ‘generic greek background ambiance music’ for a restaurant or something. Also the easy parts of the music market, same chords and beats with meaningless text sung on autotune are in its reach. It exists, people will make or save money with it, I don’t think it is going away.

            • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              27 days ago

              like generating lobby/elevator music or ‘generic greek background ambiance music’ for a restaurant or something. Also the easy parts of the music market, same chords and beats with meaningless text sung on autotune are in its reach

              You’re probably right, unfortunately. I guess I’d just file it under things that nobody wants or needs. The whole scenario you just described is really sad, and I struggle to find the actual value in it.

              • araneae@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                27 days ago

                Agreed. Tossing whole music niches to AI would be sad. “Generic restaurant Greek music” is… still music. Still traditional, historied, HUMAN singing and art. Just because you (original commenter) don’t care doesn’t mean no one else does. I want to hear humans sing. Not algorithms.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      AI is definitely capable of making great music right now.

      Is it capable of creating another masterpiece, or introduce a new style of music? That’s debatable, but I guess in the future it will be possible.

      Do I want to listen to AI music on regular basis though? Fuck no.

      • drspod@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        27 days ago

        AI is definitely capable of making great music right now.

        Got any links?

  • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    26 days ago

    I knew and have talked to a guy who makes AI generated music, and he’s as insufferable as you could imagine. He made YouTube channels and used all the shady tactics you could to get monetized, fake Roblox videos, fake drop shipping tip videos, botting subs, etc.

    I’ve even had the misfortune of being featured against my will on one of his songs under an old alias!

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    28 days ago

    it is not a scam. ppl pay for music, not art. dua lipa sounds like it is AI remixing the 80s. we need to stop pretending pop music is better than bird music. you can get paid for playing live. napster ftw.