• Dark_Lords_Servant@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Actors get paid based on their popularity, or said differently, you get paid shit if you are not known by millions. You can be the worst actor and get paid millions, while the best actor of the century gets paid minimum wage because noone knows about him.

    • Bonehead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      169
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a little more complicated than that. Carrey was negotiating for Dumb and Dumber when Ace Ventura hit the box office. By the time the negotiations ended, there wasn’t much money left for other actors. But that one movie was really all that he was known for at the time. So it was still a huge risk for a potential flash in the pan.

      Daniels wanted to expand his career into comedy, but the producers didn’t want him since he wasn’t known for comedy. He had done a lot of movies by that point though and was well known, just not for comedy. So they threw him a lowball number to get rid of him. He wasn’t suppose to take it.

      It was all just really wild timing on Carrey’s part and priorities not focused on money on Daniels’ part.

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dumb and Dumber is my favorite comedy of all time, but I’ve avoided that sequel like the plague. It looks like it has the budget of an SNL sketch

          • NathanielThomas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re not missing much. I mean, it’s a 20 year gap in their careers. There’s a gag earlier in the film where Daniels visits Carrey in a nursing home because he’s fallen into a coma for 20 years and then Carrey finally “wakes up” and says it was all a gag. It’s almost like a nod to the Andy Kaufman conspiracy theory that he was faking his death as part of an elaborate real life bit.

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            75
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Chatgpt is in no way shape or form a reliable source of information. The Information provided may be out of date, out of context, or even wildly wrong and you have no way to verify this unless you do the research yourself.

            All our current parodies of actual AI are able to do is be very convincing that what they say is true. They don’t know if it’s true, nor are they able to figure that out. They don’t care either. They are just chatbots with bells and whistles.

            Do not use them as sources of information, if anything have them give you an answer that you can then use as a starting point to verify their truthfulness.

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            1 year ago

            According to chatgpt

            According to my hairdresser, chatgpt is not a reliable source of information.

          • XEAL@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            As much as I am a ChatGPT fan, you cannot trust it when it comes down to factual data unless you’re using a custom model with a specific knowledgebase.

          • Ithi@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think a lot of basic obscure facts like this are likely to be inaccurate from ChatGPT if its difficult to find it from a basic search engine.

            Who knows what random source it is viewing as the “truth” and spitting back out to people.

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is so hard to read, I’m assuming you’re 6 years-old. Or an AI, the end result is the same…

      • Dark_Lords_Servant@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, interesting. Thank you for the info! I was going with a general knowledge that the more well known actors get paid more because of their popularity. Seema this one was a different case.

      • HellAwaits@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dumb logic. That’s like saying the Kardashians are extremely talented people.

        • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are extremely talented at publicity and marketing.

          Which is all a movie studio really cares about because that sells tickets.

      • Dark_Lords_Servant@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        An actor’s popularity is dependent on if they have a major role in popular movies, a large social media presence, or things like that. Many people don’t exactly care about quality in movies, or the actors ability to act.

        There are some great actors we probably never heard of, because they are cast in minor roles, or in movies barely anyone knows about.